rs177702

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000552.5(VWF):​c.6799-14C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.786 in 1,612,346 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 500,481 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.76 ( 43962 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.79 ( 456519 hom. )

Consequence

VWF
NM_000552.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.05

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VWF (HGNC:12726): (von Willebrand factor) This gene encodes a glycoprotein involved in hemostasis. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed following assembly into large multimeric complexes. These complexes function in the adhesion of platelets to sites of vascular injury and the transport of various proteins in the blood. Mutations in this gene result in von Willebrand disease, an inherited bleeding disorder. An unprocessed pseudogene has been found on chromosome 22. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
VWF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary von Willebrand disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • von Willebrand disease type 2B
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease 2
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • von Willebrand disease 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2M
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • von Willebrand disease type 2N
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 12-5985679-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-5985679-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 256693.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.8 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VWFNM_000552.5 linkc.6799-14C>T intron_variant Intron 38 of 51 ENST00000261405.10 NP_000543.3 P04275-1
VWFXM_047429501.1 linkc.6799-14C>T intron_variant Intron 38 of 51 XP_047285457.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VWFENST00000261405.10 linkc.6799-14C>T intron_variant Intron 38 of 51 1 NM_000552.5 ENSP00000261405.5 P04275-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.758
AC:
115204
AN:
152080
Hom.:
43924
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.673
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.783
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.811
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.826
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.673
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.671
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.793
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.639
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.800
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.771
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.779
AC:
194353
AN:
249600
AF XY:
0.774
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.671
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.873
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.821
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.674
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.798
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.801
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.785
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.789
AC:
1152384
AN:
1460148
Hom.:
456519
Cov.:
39
AF XY:
0.786
AC XY:
570996
AN XY:
726442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.658
AC:
22015
AN:
33444
American (AMR)
AF:
0.867
AC:
38758
AN:
44692
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.822
AC:
21475
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.729
AC:
28915
AN:
39676
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.682
AC:
58802
AN:
86184
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.800
AC:
42531
AN:
53174
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.731
AC:
4210
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.800
AC:
889133
AN:
1110754
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.771
AC:
46545
AN:
60336
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.490
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12139
24279
36418
48558
60697
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20708
41416
62124
82832
103540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.758
AC:
115297
AN:
152198
Hom.:
43962
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.756
AC XY:
56263
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.673
AC:
27937
AN:
41524
American (AMR)
AF:
0.812
AC:
12418
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.826
AC:
2865
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.674
AC:
3476
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.671
AC:
3241
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.793
AC:
8401
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.639
AC:
188
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.800
AC:
54427
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.772
AC:
1630
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1424
2847
4271
5694
7118
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
858
1716
2574
3432
4290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.774
Hom.:
9182
Bravo
AF:
0.759
Asia WGS
AF:
0.696
AC:
2422
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

von Willebrand disease type 2 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

von Willebrand disease type 3 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

von Willebrand disease type 1 Benign:1
Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary von Willebrand disease Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
0.11
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
-1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs177702; hg19: chr12-6094845; API