rs17783459
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_015559.3(SETBP1):c.486+47279C>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0949 in 152,236 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 835 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.095 ( 835 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
SETBP1
NM_015559.3 intron
NM_015559.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.367
Publications
6 publications found
Genes affected
SETBP1 (HGNC:15573): (SET binding protein 1) This gene encodes a protein which contains a several motifs including a ski homology region and a SET-binding region in addition to three nuclear localization signals. The encoded protein has been shown to bind the SET nuclear oncogene which is involved in DNA replication. Mutations in this gene are associated with Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
SETBP1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- complex neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 29Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- Schinzel-Giedion syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- intellectual disability-expressive aphasia-facial dysmorphism syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.118 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0950 AC: 14444AN: 152118Hom.: 833 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
14444
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0949 AC: 14452AN: 152236Hom.: 835 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0964 AC XY: 7172AN XY: 74420 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
14452
AN:
152236
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7172
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1797
AN:
41546
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1501
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
453
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
304
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1838
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
17
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
8192
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
209
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
682
1364
2045
2727
3409
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
158
316
474
632
790
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
123
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.