rs17850807

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_002230.4(JUP):c.405C>T(p.Asp135Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00577 in 1,613,032 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 451 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.031 ( 237 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 214 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.14

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

JUP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
inherited epidermolysis bullosa
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Naxos disease
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

JUP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).

BP6

Variant 17-41769481-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41769481-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 45850.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.14 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.103 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
JUP	NM_002230.4 link	c.405C>T	p.Asp135Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 14	ENST00000393931.8	NP_002221.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
JUP	ENST00000393931.8 link	c.405C>T	p.Asp135Asp	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 14	1	NM_002230.4	ENSP00000377508.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0310

AC:

4714

AN:

152172

Hom.:

237

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.106

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0149

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000603

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0225

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00820

AC:

2027

AN:

247202

AF XY:

0.00603

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.110

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00660

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000340

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00249

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00314

AC:

4594

AN:

1460742

Hom.:

214

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00261

AC XY:

1897

AN XY:

726620

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.107

AC:

3576

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00749

AC:

334

AN:

44598

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26098

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39674

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000151

AC:

AN:

86026

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53090

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000210

AC:

233

AN:

1111688

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00701

AC:

423

AN:

60334

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.491

Heterozygous variant carriers

296

592

887

1183

1479

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

110

220

330

440

550

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0310

AC:

4717

AN:

152290

Hom.:

237

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0298

AC XY:

2223

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.106

AC:

4400

AN:

41536

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0148

AC:

227

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000603

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0222

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

213

426

640

853

1066

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

104

156

208

260

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0134

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0355

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00635

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000654

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 24, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Asp135Asp in Exon 3 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 10.2% (380/3736) of Eu ropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; rs17850807). -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Naxos disease

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Apr 06, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 26, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.73

CADD

Benign

0.47

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.68

PhyloP100

-1.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism (auto)

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over