Menu
GeneBe

rs17880521

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.4929G>A(p.Val1643=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00457 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 86 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V1643V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 43 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 43 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 17-31325913-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31325913-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 184149.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31325913-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0144 (2188/152250) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0427 (1772/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.041. There are 43 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1048 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 2185 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4929G>A p.Val1643= synonymous_variant 37/58 ENST00000358273.9
NF1NM_000267.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4866G>A p.Val1622= synonymous_variant 36/57

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4929G>A p.Val1643= synonymous_variant 37/581 NM_001042492.3 P1P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0144
AC:
2185
AN:
152132
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0427
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00525
AC:
1319
AN:
251306
Hom.:
19
AF XY:
0.00439
AC XY:
596
AN XY:
135816
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0443
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00503
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00685
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00783
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00355
AC:
5194
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00340
AC XY:
2470
AN XY:
727204
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0481
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00581
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00727
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000742
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00633
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0144
AC:
2188
AN:
152250
Hom.:
43
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0141
AC XY:
1048
AN XY:
74440
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0427
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00209
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0156
Alfa
AF:
0.0101
Hom.:
15
Bravo
AF:
0.0172
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00318
AC:
12
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00371
EpiControl
AF:
0.00296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 20, 2014p.Val1643Val in exon 37 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.2% (21/8600) of Eu ropean American chromosomes and 4.3% (191/4406) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome sequencing project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs17880521). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMar 15, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenOct 26, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 22, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 13, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 30, 2016Variant summary: The NF1 c.4866G>A (p.Val1622Val) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 3/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant may affect ESE site of SC35. This variant was found in 687/121388 control chromosomes (11 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0441346 (459/10400). This frequency is about 212 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NF1 variant (0.0002084), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. This variant has been reported in NF1 patients and RT-PCR showed no changes on transcripts; authors classified this variant as a polymorphism (Boulandet, 2000). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2023NF1: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 23, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 21, 2014General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance -
Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 21, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
Cadd
Benign
6.8
Dann
Benign
0.76

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17880521; hg19: chr17-29652931; COSMIC: COSV55986970; COSMIC: COSV55986970; API