rs1799802

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):​c.1135C>T​(p.Pro379Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00556 in 1,611,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0045 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0057 ( 32 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC4
NM_005236.3 missense

Scores

7
9
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.57

Publications

40 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC4 (HGNC:3436): (ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with ERCC1 and is involved in the 5' incision made during nucleotide excision repair. This complex is a structure specific DNA repair endonuclease that interacts with EME1. Defects in this gene are a cause of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F), or xeroderma pigmentosum VI (XP6).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
ERCC4 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • xeroderma pigmentosum group F
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, ClinGen
  • Fanconi anemia complementation group Q
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • XFE progeroid syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Fanconi anemia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • xeroderma pigmentosum
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome complex
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: AlphaMissense, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN [when BayesDel_addAF, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011538804).
BP6
Variant 16-13934224-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-13934224-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 134148.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0045 (680/150956) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00683 (463/67780). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00632. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 346 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 32 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC4NM_005236.3 linkc.1135C>T p.Pro379Ser missense_variant Exon 7 of 11 ENST00000311895.8 NP_005227.1 Q92889-1A0A1W1GSK9
ERCC4XM_011522424.4 linkc.1273C>T p.Pro425Ser missense_variant Exon 8 of 12 XP_011520726.1 A0A804HKF9
ERCC4XM_047433774.1 linkc.346C>T p.Pro116Ser missense_variant Exon 4 of 8 XP_047289730.1
ERCC4XM_011522427.2 linkc.-216C>T 5_prime_UTR_variant Exon 2 of 6 XP_011520729.1 B4DXD8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC4ENST00000311895.8 linkc.1135C>T p.Pro379Ser missense_variant Exon 7 of 11 1 NM_005236.3 ENSP00000310520.7 Q92889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00451
AC:
680
AN:
150838
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000951
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00431
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00971
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00683
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00242
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00400
AC:
1003
AN:
250774
AF XY:
0.00416
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000991
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00721
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00607
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00507
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00567
AC:
8286
AN:
1460892
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00548
AC XY:
3981
AN XY:
726776
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000956
AC:
32
AN:
33468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00197
AC:
88
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00153
AC:
40
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39640
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000997
AC:
86
AN:
86232
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00787
AC:
419
AN:
53230
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00655
AC:
7283
AN:
1111378
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00558
AC:
337
AN:
60346
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.443
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
385
770
1156
1541
1926
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
264
528
792
1056
1320
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00450
AC:
680
AN:
150956
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00470
AC XY:
346
AN XY:
73614
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000948
AC:
39
AN:
41142
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00430
AC:
65
AN:
15106
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3462
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5098
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
5
AN:
4792
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00971
AC:
100
AN:
10294
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
286
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00683
AC:
463
AN:
67780
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00239
AC:
5
AN:
2088
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
35
70
104
139
174
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00512
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.00375
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00566
AC:
21
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00701
AC:
27
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00159
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00581
AC:
50
ExAC
AF:
0.00373
AC:
453
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00507
EpiControl
AF:
0.00587

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ERCC4: BS2 -

May 06, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2Other:1
Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

Mar 24, 2021
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2022
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ERCC4 c.1135C>T (p.Pro379Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.004 in 250774 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 20 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ERCC4 causing Xeroderma Pigmentosum phenotype (0.00019), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as benign (n=2), likely benign (n=1) and VUS (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum Benign:1
Nov 11, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

ERCC4-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 25, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C1970416:XFE progeroid syndrome;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q Benign:1
-
Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant has been reported in the literature in the compound heterozygous and homozygous states in at least 3 individuals with mild xeroderma pigmentosum (Ahmad 2010 PMID:20221251; Fassihi 2016 PMID:26884178). This variant is present in the Genome Aggregation Database (Highest reported MAF: 0.7% [463/67788], including in 7 total homozygotes; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/16-13934224-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r3), and is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:134148). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools for this variant are unclear. Functional studies have shown a mildly deleterious effect of this variant on some aspects of protein function, while minimal to no effect on other aspects (Ahmad 2010 PMID:20221251; Sabatella 2018 PMID:30165384). However, these studies may not accurately represent in vivo biological function. This variant may confer a slight increase in the risk for sunburn (OR: 1.31, 95% CI [1.257, 1.431]) (Backman 2021 PMID:34662886). In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease but requires further evidence. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Dec 17, 2024
Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BA1 c.1135C>T, located in exon 7 of the ERCC4 gene, is predicted to result in the substitution of Proline by Serine at codon 379, p.(Pro379Ser). The variant allele was found in 722/117866 alleles (5 homozygotes), with a filter allele frequency of 0.57% at 95% confidence, within the NFE population in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database (non-cancer data set) (BA1). The SpliceAI algorithm predicts no significant impact on splicing and the REVEL meta-predictor score (0.52) for this variant is indeterminate regarding the effect that it may have on protein function according Pejaver 2022 thresholds (PMID: 36413997). It has been studied in functional assays. They have shown a mildly deleterious effect of this variant on some aspects of protein function, while minimal to no effect on other aspects (PMID: 20221251, 30165384). It may confer a slight increase in the risk for sunburn (OR: 1.31, 95% CI [1.257, 1.431]) (PMID: 34662886). It has been reported in ClinVar (3x benign, 5x likely benign, 2x uncertain significance, 1x not provided). Based on currently available information, c.1135C>T is classified as a benign variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.75
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.080
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
CADD
Pathogenic
26
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.55
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.98
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.14
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.24
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.9
H
PhyloP100
7.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-7.9
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.53
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.71
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.45
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.72
gMVP
0.79
Mutation Taster
=81/19
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799802; hg19: chr16-14028081; COSMIC: COSV100318624; API