Menu
GeneBe

rs1799812

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000384.3(APOB):c.10131G>A(p.Leu3377=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00698 in 1,613,994 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 66 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0056 ( 7 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0071 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

APOB
NM_000384.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.14
Variant links:
Genes affected
APOB (HGNC:603): (apolipoprotein B) This gene product is the main apolipoprotein of chylomicrons and low density lipoproteins (LDL), and is the ligand for the LDL receptor. It occurs in plasma as two main isoforms, apoB-48 and apoB-100: the former is synthesized exclusively in the gut and the latter in the liver. The intestinal and the hepatic forms of apoB are encoded by a single gene from a single, very long mRNA. The two isoforms share a common N-terminal sequence. The shorter apoB-48 protein is produced after RNA editing of the apoB-100 transcript at residue 2180 (CAA->UAA), resulting in the creation of a stop codon, and early translation termination. Mutations in this gene or its regulatory region cause hypobetalipoproteinemia, normotriglyceridemic hypobetalipoproteinemia, and hypercholesterolemia due to ligand-defective apoB, diseases affecting plasma cholesterol and apoB levels. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.53).
BP6
Variant 2-21006737-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-21006737-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 265890.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=5, Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr2-21006737-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-21006737-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.14 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 7 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
APOBNM_000384.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.10131G>A p.Leu3377= synonymous_variant 26/29 ENST00000233242.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
APOBENST00000233242.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.10131G>A p.Leu3377= synonymous_variant 26/291 NM_000384.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00557
AC:
847
AN:
152104
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00465
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00290
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00928
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00579
AC:
1453
AN:
250764
Hom.:
11
AF XY:
0.00626
AC XY:
848
AN XY:
135502
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000926
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000795
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00526
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00509
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00850
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00932
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00713
AC:
10425
AN:
1461772
Hom.:
59
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00713
AC XY:
5182
AN XY:
727188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00161
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00409
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00541
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00541
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00802
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00737
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00556
AC:
847
AN:
152222
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00539
AC XY:
401
AN XY:
74432
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00465
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00481
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00928
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00520
Alfa
AF:
0.00682
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00496
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00840
EpiControl
AF:
0.00996

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024APOB: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 23, 2022- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthJun 27, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchFundacion Hipercolesterolemia FamiliarMar 01, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo JorgeMar 01, 2016MAF = 4% in 200 normolipidaemic individuals -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRobarts Research Institute, Western UniversityJan 02, 2018- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 21, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B;C4551990:Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 09, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
Cadd
Benign
0.40
Dann
Benign
0.68
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799812; hg19: chr2-21229609; API