rs1799816
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000208.4(INSR):c.3034G>A(p.Val1012Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00754 in 1,613,900 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 83 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0054 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0078 ( 81 hom. )
Consequence
INSR
NM_000208.4 missense
NM_000208.4 missense
Scores
1
13
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.61
Genes affected
INSR (HGNC:6091): (insulin receptor) This gene encodes a member of the receptor tyrosine kinase family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate alpha and beta subunits that form a heterotetrameric receptor. Binding of insulin or other ligands to this receptor activates the insulin signaling pathway, which regulates glucose uptake and release, as well as the synthesis and storage of carbohydrates, lipids and protein. Mutations in this gene underlie the inherited severe insulin resistance syndromes including type A insulin resistance syndrome, Donohue syndrome and Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), INSR. . Gene score misZ 3.8314 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 5.4593 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with insulin-resistance syndrome type A, hyperinsulinism due to INSR deficiency, Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome, Donohue syndrome.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010013849).
BP6
Variant 19-7125507-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-7125507-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 14707.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-7125507-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr19-7125507-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0054 (823/152268) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0178 (86/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0148. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 401 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | NM_000208.4 | c.3034G>A | p.Val1012Met | missense_variant | 17/22 | ENST00000302850.10 | NP_000199.2 | |
INSR | NM_001079817.3 | c.2998G>A | p.Val1000Met | missense_variant | 16/21 | NP_001073285.1 | ||
INSR | XM_011527988.3 | c.3031G>A | p.Val1011Met | missense_variant | 17/22 | XP_011526290.2 | ||
INSR | XM_011527989.4 | c.2995G>A | p.Val999Met | missense_variant | 16/21 | XP_011526291.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INSR | ENST00000302850.10 | c.3034G>A | p.Val1012Met | missense_variant | 17/22 | 1 | NM_000208.4 | ENSP00000303830 | A2 | |
INSR | ENST00000341500.9 | c.2998G>A | p.Val1000Met | missense_variant | 16/21 | 1 | ENSP00000342838 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00542 AC: 824AN: 152150Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
824
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00841 AC: 2113AN: 251110Hom.: 18 AF XY: 0.00964 AC XY: 1309AN XY: 135724
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2113
AN:
251110
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
1309
AN XY:
135724
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00776 AC: 11343AN: 1461632Hom.: 81 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00848 AC XY: 6166AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
11343
AN:
1461632
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
6166
AN XY:
727122
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00540 AC: 823AN: 152268Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00539 AC XY: 401AN XY: 74440
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
823
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
401
AN XY:
74440
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
32
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
26
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
74
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1090
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
22
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 23, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | INSR: PP2, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 01, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 28, 2015 | - - |
Insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus AND acanthosis nigricans Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Type 2 diabetes mellitus Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Mar 01, 1999 | - - |
Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Jan 08, 2018 | ACMG criteria: PP3 (8 predictors), BS2 (107 controls in T2DM and 92 cases in type2diabetesgenetics.org), BS1 (1.53% in South Asian population in 1000g and 2.25% in ExAC South Asian pop), BP6 (Benign from Emory, but conflicting data (VUS from Chicago, LB from Illumina and Children's Mercy)=benign - |
Bailey-Bloch congenital myopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | - | The heterozygous p.Val1012Met variant in INSR has been identified in an individual with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and an unaffected individual (PMID: 2040394). This variant has also been identified in >2% of South Asian chromosomes and 11 homozygotes by ExAC (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Please note that individuals in ExAC may have type II diabetes. In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus NIDDM. - |
Leprechaunism syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Pathogenic
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
.;D
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
.;M
MutationTaster
Benign
A;A
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
1.4
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at