Menu
GeneBe

rs1799939

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1

The NM_020975.6(RET):c.2071G>A(p.Gly691Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.184 in 1,612,242 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29,287 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G691C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.17 ( 2471 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.19 ( 26816 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 missense

Scores

1
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:21O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.41
Variant links:
Genes affected
RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005253911).
BP6
Variant 10-43114671-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43114671-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 24934.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=13, not_provided=1, Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-43114671-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.242 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RETNM_020975.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2071G>A p.Gly691Ser missense_variant 11/20 ENST00000355710.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RETENST00000355710.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2071G>A p.Gly691Ser missense_variant 11/205 NM_020975.6 P4P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.170
AC:
25745
AN:
151742
Hom.:
2472
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.101
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.158
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.248
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.202
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.105
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.243
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.230
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.255
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.182
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.182
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.210
AC:
52572
AN:
250098
Hom.:
6336
AF XY:
0.208
AC XY:
28214
AN XY:
135328
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0983
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.354
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.195
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.116
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.255
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.218
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.185
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.220
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.185
AC:
270502
AN:
1460382
Hom.:
26816
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.187
AC XY:
135943
AN XY:
726526
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0963
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.338
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.199
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0943
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.257
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.212
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.178
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.180
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.170
AC:
25747
AN:
151860
Hom.:
2471
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.173
AC XY:
12841
AN XY:
74188
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.101
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.248
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.202
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.105
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.243
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.230
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.182
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.179
Alfa
AF:
0.180
Hom.:
3497
Bravo
AF:
0.170
TwinsUK
AF:
0.182
AC:
674
ALSPAC
AF:
0.181
AC:
699
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.103
AC:
455
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.185
AC:
1587
ExAC
AF:
0.202
AC:
24557
Asia WGS
AF:
0.169
AC:
586
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.189
EpiControl
AF:
0.194

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 31, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAl Jalila Children's Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality HospitalDec 10, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 31, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 11, 2013Gly691Ser in exon 11 of RET: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it has been identified in 21% (276/1321) chromosomes from a broa d, though clinically and racially unspecified population (dbSNP rs1799939). -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 28, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 04, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 01, 2017- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, IncNov 01, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetics and Molecular Pathology, SA PathologyAug 06, 2019- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.073
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.43
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.86
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.42
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.84
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.79
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.39
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0053
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.55
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.95
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.12
T;T
Polyphen
0.062
B;B
Vest4
0.045
MPC
0.20
ClinPred
0.015
T
GERP RS
-1.1
Varity_R
0.039
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799939; hg19: chr10-43610119; COSMIC: COSV60687096; COSMIC: COSV60687096; API