rs1799943

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):​c.-26G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.257 in 1,601,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 55,659 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.21 ( 3886 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.26 ( 51773 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:23O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.546
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant 13-32316435-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32316435-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 125965.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32316435-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32316435-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.373 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-26G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 2/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.-26G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 2/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.214
AC:
32462
AN:
152032
Hom.:
3894
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.106
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.159
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.190
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.281
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.281
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.191
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.310
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.266
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.228
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.246
AC:
61394
AN:
250044
Hom.:
7996
AF XY:
0.251
AC XY:
33947
AN XY:
135172
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.101
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.191
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.270
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.375
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.285
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.200
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.258
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.243
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.262
AC:
379895
AN:
1449454
Hom.:
51773
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.264
AC XY:
190683
AN XY:
721840
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0975
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.193
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.276
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.423
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.287
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.199
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.265
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.259
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.213
AC:
32439
AN:
152152
Hom.:
3886
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.212
AC XY:
15766
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.106
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.189
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.281
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.387
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.279
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.191
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.266
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.225
Alfa
AF:
0.258
Hom.:
11049
Bravo
AF:
0.207
Asia WGS
AF:
0.255
AC:
889
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:10
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)May 29, 2002- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.3689 (Asian), 0.04878 (African), 0.2282 (European), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 17, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsFeb 08, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGreenArray Genomic Research & Solutions of Accurate Diagnostic Private Limited-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneKor MSANov 01, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 27, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 24, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32398771, 17945002, 23249957, 20352487, 22513257, 16760289) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 09, 2015- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Other:1
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGenomic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
8.8
DANN
Benign
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1799943; hg19: chr13-32890572; COSMIC: COSV61525225; COSMIC: COSV61525225; API