Menu
GeneBe

rs1800060

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6235G>A(p.Val2079Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00171 in 1,611,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2079A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 9 hom., cov: 28)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:23O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0380
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008029282).
BP6
Variant 11-108317409-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 133629.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00592 (897/151400) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0174 (718/41218). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0164. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 414 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.6235G>A p.Val2079Ile missense_variant 43/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.6235G>A p.Val2079Ile missense_variant 43/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00594
AC:
898
AN:
151284
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
28
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0175
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00508
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000831
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000961
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00530
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
634
AN:
251386
Hom.:
5
AF XY:
0.00202
AC XY:
275
AN XY:
135868
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0177
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000748
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00128
AC:
1864
AN:
1460360
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
875
AN XY:
726554
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0184
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0143
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000505
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000462
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00244
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00592
AC:
897
AN:
151400
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
28
AF XY:
0.00560
AC XY:
414
AN XY:
73910
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0174
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00507
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0133
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000624
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000961
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00525
Alfa
AF:
0.00304
Hom.:
4
Bravo
AF:
0.00731
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0166
AC:
73
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000582
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.00257
AC:
312
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000872
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:23Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 22, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 06, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 11, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterJun 28, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical CenterJun 18, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Sep 15, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 16, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 14, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsJun 01, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 16, 2023- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJun 29, 2021- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Val2079Ile variant was identified in 9 of 9208 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00119) from individuals or families with breast cancer, Hodgkin’s disease and was present in 6 of 852 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.007) from healthy individuals (Bretsky 2003, Offit 2002, Tavtigian 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800060) as With Benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry genetics, Invitae, PreventionGenetics), MutDB (classified as polymorphism), databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 779(8 homozygous) of 276904 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0028 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 426 of 23972 chromosomes (freq: 0.018), Ashkenazi Jewish* in 143 of 10150 chromosomes (freq: 0.014). The p.Val2079 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the PIK-related kinase Armadillo-type fold functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.72
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
Cadd
Benign
0.0050
Dann
Benign
0.62
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.059
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0034
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.40
T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0080
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.31
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.078
Sift
Benign
0.40
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.50
T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
B;B
Vest4
0.10
MVP
0.44
MPC
0.099
ClinPred
0.0056
T
GERP RS
-12
Varity_R
0.038
gMVP
0.11

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800060; hg19: chr11-108188136; COSMIC: COSV53744931; COSMIC: COSV53744931; API