rs1800060

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.6235G>A(p.Val2079Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00171 in 1,611,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 9 hom., cov: 28)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0380

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

ATM links:

C11orf65 (HGNC:28519): (chromosome 11 open reading frame 65) Predicted to be involved in negative regulation of mitochondrial fission and negative regulation of protein targeting to mitochondrion. Predicted to be located in cytosol and mitochondrial outer membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

C11orf65 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008029282).

BP6

Variant 11-108317409-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 133629.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108317409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00592 (897/151400) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0174 (718/41218). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0164. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 414 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATM	NM_000051.4 link	c.6235G>A	p.Val2079Ile	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 63	ENST00000675843.1	NP_000042.3	Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATM	ENST00000675843.1 link	c.6235G>A	p.Val2079Ile	missense_variant	Exon 43 of 63		NM_000051.4	ENSP00000501606.1		Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00594

AC:

898

AN:

151284

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0175

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00508

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000831

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000961

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00530

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00252

AC:

634

AN:

251386

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00202

AC XY:

275

AN XY:

135868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0177

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00188

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0145

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00108

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000748

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00261

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00128

AC:

1864

AN:

1460360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

875

AN XY:

726554

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0184

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000505

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000462

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00244

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00592

AC:

897

AN:

151400

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00560

AC XY:

414

AN XY:

73910

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0174

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00507

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000195

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000624

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000961

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000589

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00525

Alfa

AF:

0.00304

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00731

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0166

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000582

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00257

AC:

312

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000872

EpiControl

AF:

0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:25Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:8Other:1

Oct 11, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2017

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 22, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome

Benign:6

Jun 28, 2016

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 18, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

May 10, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Jul 14, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 16, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 15, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 05, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jun 29, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The ATM p.Val2079Ile variant was identified in 9 of 9208 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00119) from individuals or families with breast cancer, Hodgkinâ€šÃ„Ã´s disease and was present in 6 of 852 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.007) from healthy individuals (Bretsky 2003, Offit 2002, Tavtigian 2009). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1800060) as With Benign allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by GeneDx, Ambry genetics, Invitae, PreventionGenetics), MutDB (classified as polymorphism), databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, ATM-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 779(8 homozygous) of 276904 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0028 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 426 of 23972 chromosomes (freq: 0.018), Ashkenazi Jewish* in 143 of 10150 chromosomes (freq: 0.014). The p.Val2079 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. The variant is located with the PIK-related kinase Armadillo-type fold functional domain increasing the likelihood that it may have clinical significance. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.071

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.72

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

0.0050

DANN

Benign

0.62

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.059

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-1.8

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.9

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0034

LIST_S2

Benign

0.40

T;.

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0080

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.90

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.31

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.078

Sift

Benign

0.40

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.50

T;T

Polyphen

0.0020

B;B

Vest4

0.10

MVP

0.44

MPC

0.099

ClinPred

0.0056

GERP RS

-12

Varity_R

0.038

gMVP

0.11

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.040

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over