rs1800076

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000492.4(CFTR):c.224G>A(p.Arg75Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0301 in 1,611,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,043 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.019 ( 44 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.031 ( 999 hom. )

Consequence

CFTR
NM_000492.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:16O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.71

Variant links:

Genes affected

CFTR (HGNC:1884): (CF transmembrane conductance regulator) This gene encodes a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily. The encoded protein functions as a chloride channel, making it unique among members of this protein family, and controls ion and water secretion and absorption in epithelial tissues. Channel activation is mediated by cycles of regulatory domain phosphorylation, ATP-binding by the nucleotide-binding domains, and ATP hydrolysis. Mutations in this gene cause cystic fibrosis, the most common lethal genetic disorder in populations of Northern European descent. The most frequently occurring mutation in cystic fibrosis, DeltaF508, results in impaired folding and trafficking of the encoded protein. Multiple pseudogenes have been identified in the human genome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

CFTR links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PM1

In a helix (size 27) in uniprot entity CFTR_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_000492.4

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011586249).

BP6

Variant 7-117509093-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-117509093-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 35839.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=6, Likely_benign=8, not_provided=2}. Variant chr7-117509093-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-117509093-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0186 (2830/152290) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0342 (2325/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.033. There are 44 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1183 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 44 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CFTR	NM_000492.4 link	c.224G>A	p.Arg75Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 27	ENST00000003084.11	NP_000483.3	P13569-1A0A024R730

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CFTR	ENST00000003084.11 link	c.224G>A	p.Arg75Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 27	1	NM_000492.4	ENSP00000003084.6		P13569-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0186

AC:

2830

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00741

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00844

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00548

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0342

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00670

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0154

AC:

3874

AN:

250966

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0153

AC XY:

2080

AN XY:

135648

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00597

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00709

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00357

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00203

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00437

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0285

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0173

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0313

AC:

45647

AN:

1459320

Hom.:

999

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0299

AC XY:

21694

AN XY:

726240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00493

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00731

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00463

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000101

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00454

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0386

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0295

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0186

AC:

2830

AN:

152290

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0159

AC XY:

1183

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00739

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00843

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00548

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0342

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00663

Alfa

AF:

0.0260

Hom.:

120

Bravo

AF:

0.0187

TwinsUK

AF:

0.0353

AC:

131

ALSPAC

AF:

0.0475

AC:

183

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00976

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.0308

AC:

265

ExAC

AF:

0.0153

AC:

1863

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00318

AC:

AN:

3472

EpiCase

AF:

0.0323

EpiControl

AF:

0.0296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:16Other:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cystic fibrosis

Uncertain:2Benign:6

Jan 29, 2018

CFTR-France

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

the variant does not result in CFTR-RD neither -

May 18, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2022

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 06, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 22, 2014

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2023

Zotz-Klimas Genetics Lab, MVZ Zotz Klimas

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:5

Feb 22, 2024

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 28, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 16, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 03, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Oct 02, 2023

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Skane University Hospital Lund

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CFTR: BS1, BS2 -

Sep 07, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CFTR-related disorder

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Feb 01, 2022

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Hereditary pancreatitis

Benign:1Other:1

GeneReviews

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

May 18, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Lung disease, non-specific

Uncertain:1

May 14, 2015

Clinical Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Abnormality of the pancreas

Other:1

GenomeConnect, ClinGen

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpretted as Uncertain significance and reported on 02-10-2019 by Lab or GTR ID 500068. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.065

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.36

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.62

D;.;.;T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.86

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.84

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.012

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.47

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.6

L;.;.;.;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.54

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.2

N;.;.;N;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.68

Sift

Uncertain

0.0050

D;.;.;D;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.;.;D;.

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.33

MPC

0.0066

ClinPred

0.013

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.80

gMVP

0.91

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over