rs1800209
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006493.4(CLN5):c.956A>G(p.Lys319Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.104 in 1,603,422 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,419 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 4375 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.095 ( 10044 hom. )
Consequence
CLN5
NM_006493.4 missense
NM_006493.4 missense
Scores
15
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.82
Genes affected
CLN5 (HGNC:2076): (CLN5 intracellular trafficking protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0035348833).
BP6
Variant 13-77000848-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-77000848-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 128778.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr13-77000848-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.412 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | NM_006493.4 | c.956A>G | p.Lys319Arg | missense_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000377453.9 | NP_006484.2 | |
CLN5 | NM_001366624.2 | c.*405A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | NP_001353553.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | ENST00000377453.9 | c.956A>G | p.Lys319Arg | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_006493.4 | ENSP00000366673.5 | ||
ENSG00000283208 | ENST00000638147.2 | c.565+4721A>G | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490953.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.190 AC: 28876AN: 152026Hom.: 4360 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
28876
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.141 AC: 34273AN: 242548Hom.: 3656 AF XY: 0.128 AC XY: 16772AN XY: 130972
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
34273
AN:
242548
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
16772
AN XY:
130972
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0947 AC: 137381AN: 1451278Hom.: 10044 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0927 AC XY: 66897AN XY: 721282
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
137381
AN:
1451278
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
66897
AN XY:
721282
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.190 AC: 28943AN: 152144Hom.: 4375 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.191 AC XY: 14213AN XY: 74412
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
28943
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
14213
AN XY:
74412
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
276
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
265
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1771
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
676
ExAC
AF:
AC:
17061
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
702
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 08, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan | Jul 15, 2024 | This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 25% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 23. Only high quality variants are reported. - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 5 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 10, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Oct 19, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 02, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
REVEL
Benign
Polyphen
0.0
.;B
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at