rs1800267

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.1869C>T(p.Leu623Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00615 in 1,209,407 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 282 homozygotes. There are 1,923 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 125 hom., 928 hem., cov: 23)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 157 hom. 995 hem. )

Consequence

DMD
NM_004006.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.630

Variant links:

Genes affected

DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

DMD links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).

BP6

Variant X-32565825-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-32565825-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 94482.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-32565825-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-32565825-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.63 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DMD	NM_004006.3 link	c.1869C>T	p.Leu623Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 79	ENST00000357033.9	NP_003997.2	P11532

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DMD	ENST00000357033.9 link	c.1869C>T	p.Leu623Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 16 of 79	1	NM_004006.3	ENSP00000354923.3		A0A075B6G3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0321

AC:

3590

AN:

111694

Hom.:

125

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0274

AC XY:

929

AN XY:

33896

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.111

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0120

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000734

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000320

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0293

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00914

AC:

1674

AN:

183164

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00573

AC XY:

388

AN XY:

67712

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.113

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00544

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00266

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00351

AC:

3848

AN:

1097659

Hom.:

157

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00274

AC XY:

995

AN XY:

363055

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.116

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00591

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000573

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000178

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00825

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0321

AC:

3588

AN:

111748

Hom.:

125

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0273

AC XY:

928

AN XY:

33960

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.111

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0119

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000368

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000320

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0290

Alfa

AF:

0.0127

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0373

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000712

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Leu623Leu in exon 16 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 10.9% (418/3833) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs. gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs1800267). -

Jul 13, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: DMD c.1869C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 200065 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.11 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 93 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 9.84 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophiopathies phenotype (0.011), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1869C>T in individuals affected with Dystrophiopathies and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Apr 29, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:3

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency

Benign:1

Apr 21, 2017

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Oct 20, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

4.3

DANN

Benign

0.73

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over