Menu
GeneBe

rs1800281

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.10789C>T(p.Leu3597=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00651 in 1,208,653 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. There are 2,429 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L3597L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0048 ( 4 hom., 146 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0067 ( 20 hom. 2283 hem. )

Consequence

DMD
NM_004006.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 10.0
Variant links:
Genes affected
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant X-31147283-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-31147283-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 94446.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-31147283-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-31147283-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0048 (534/111150) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00737 (391/53024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00677. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 4 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DMDNM_004006.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.10789C>T p.Leu3597= synonymous_variant 75/79 ENST00000357033.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DMDENST00000357033.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.10789C>T p.Leu3597= synonymous_variant 75/791 NM_004006.3 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00481
AC:
534
AN:
111097
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00439
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
33267
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000787
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00469
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00799
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00840
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00737
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00868
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00476
AC:
871
AN:
183079
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00457
AC XY:
309
AN XY:
67649
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000684
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00976
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00732
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00509
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00669
AC:
7340
AN:
1097503
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00629
AC XY:
2283
AN XY:
362907
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000758
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00906
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00774
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00632
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00480
AC:
534
AN:
111150
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00438
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
33330
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000785
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00468
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00799
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00737
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00858
Alfa
AF:
0.00545
Hom.:
42
Bravo
AF:
0.00466
EpiCase
AF:
0.00638
EpiControl
AF:
0.00818

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 09, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 23, 2015p.Leu3597Leu in exon 75 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.7% (338/47956) of European chromosomes, including 129 hemizygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consor tium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs1800281). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 20, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoAug 15, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 15, 2020- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 23, 2023- -
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabMay 18, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 11, 2020- -
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;C3668940:Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsFeb 18, 2022- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 11, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
Cadd
Benign
7.5
Dann
Benign
0.82

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800281; hg19: chrX-31165400; COSMIC: COSV58932918; API