rs1800350

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000231.3(SGCG):​c.228T>C​(p.Asp76Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.121 in 1,610,324 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,336 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 ( 1990 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.12 ( 11346 hom. )

Consequence

SGCG
NM_000231.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.46

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SGCG (HGNC:10809): (sarcoglycan gamma) This gene encodes gamma-sarcoglycan, one of several sarcolemmal transmembrane glycoproteins that interact with dystrophin. The dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) spans the sarcolemma and is comprised of dystrophin, syntrophin, alpha- and beta-dystroglycans and sarcoglycans. The DGC provides a structural link between the subsarcolemmal cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix of muscle cells. Defects in the encoded protein can lead to early onset autosomal recessive muscular dystrophy, in particular limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, type 2C (LGMD2C). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
SGCG Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2C
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 13-23234643-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-23234643-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 92653.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.46 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.244 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SGCGNM_000231.3 linkc.228T>C p.Asp76Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 8 ENST00000218867.4 NP_000222.2 Q13326

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SGCGENST00000218867.4 linkc.228T>C p.Asp76Asp synonymous_variant Exon 3 of 8 1 NM_000231.3 ENSP00000218867.3 Q13326

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.147
AC:
22276
AN:
151854
Hom.:
1988
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.249
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.121
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.102
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.125
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.101
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0780
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.122
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.130
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.105
AC:
26294
AN:
251362
AF XY:
0.104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.253
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0573
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.131
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000815
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0795
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.118
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.106
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.118
AC:
172428
AN:
1458354
Hom.:
11346
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.117
AC XY:
84883
AN XY:
725660
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.252
AC:
8390
AN:
33350
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0614
AC:
2747
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.129
AC:
3376
AN:
26104
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000429
AC:
17
AN:
39632
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.101
AC:
8663
AN:
86166
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0843
AC:
4502
AN:
53412
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0779
AC:
448
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.124
AC:
137031
AN:
1108950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.120
AC:
7254
AN:
60266
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.457
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6400
12799
19199
25598
31998
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4976
9952
14928
19904
24880
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.147
AC:
22283
AN:
151970
Hom.:
1990
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.141
AC XY:
10438
AN XY:
74288
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.248
AC:
10289
AN:
41412
American (AMR)
AF:
0.102
AC:
1554
AN:
15262
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.125
AC:
435
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
6
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.101
AC:
488
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0780
AC:
823
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0816
AC:
24
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.122
AC:
8284
AN:
67970
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.128
AC:
270
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
905
1811
2716
3622
4527
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
236
472
708
944
1180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.134
Hom.:
1270
Bravo
AF:
0.154
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0640
AC:
224
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.118
EpiControl
AF:
0.118

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 16, 2012
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2014
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp76Asp in exon 3 of SGCG: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it has been identified in 24% (1040/4406) of African American c hromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/E VS/; dbSNP rs1800350). -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2C Benign:3
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 14, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, recessive Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sarcoglycanopathy Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
3.7
DANN
Benign
0.44
PhyloP100
1.5
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800350; hg19: chr13-23808782; API