rs1800549
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000350.3(ABCA4):c.4283C>T(p.Thr1428Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00161 in 1,614,220 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 55 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T1428T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000350.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCA4 | NM_000350.3 | c.4283C>T | p.Thr1428Met | missense_variant | 29/50 | ENST00000370225.4 | |
ABCA4 | XM_047416704.1 | c.4061C>T | p.Thr1354Met | missense_variant | 28/49 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCA4 | ENST00000370225.4 | c.4283C>T | p.Thr1428Met | missense_variant | 29/50 | 1 | NM_000350.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00223 AC: 340AN: 152238Hom.: 7 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00457 AC: 1150AN: 251468Hom.: 30 AF XY: 0.00428 AC XY: 582AN XY: 135904
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00155 AC: 2262AN: 1461866Hom.: 49 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00152 AC XY: 1102AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00221 AC: 337AN: 152354Hom.: 6 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00264 AC XY: 197AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25087612, 23953153, 20981092, 9295268, 32619608) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Retina International | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 09, 2014 | - - |
Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Stargardt Disease, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
ABCA4-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cone-Rod Dystrophy, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Macular degeneration Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at