rs1800576
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000361.3(THBD):c.127G>A(p.Ala43Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00368 in 1,598,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A43A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000361.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome with thrombomodulin anomalyInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- thrombomodulin-related bleeding disorderInheritance: AR, AD, Unknown Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- atypical hemolytic-uremic syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000361.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00252 AC: 383AN: 151782Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00200 AC: 432AN: 215894 AF XY: 0.00199 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00381 AC: 5506AN: 1446366Hom.: 12 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00377 AC XY: 2709AN XY: 718436 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00252 AC: 383AN: 151910Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00228 AC XY: 169AN XY: 74278 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at