rs1800742

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1110G>A(p.Gln370Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0106 in 1,613,538 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 122 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0081 ( 9 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 113 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.02

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 16-2060804-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2060804-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 49141.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2060804-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.02 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00814 (1240/152292) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0115 (782/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0108. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 581 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 1240 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.1110G>A	p.Gln370Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.1110G>A	p.Gln370Gln	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00817

AC:

1243

AN:

152174

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00864

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0346

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00683

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00433

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0573

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0115

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0100

AC:

2511

AN:

250212

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0101

AC XY:

1373

AN XY:

135582

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00148

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00512

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0335

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00549

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00603

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0140

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.0162

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0108

AC:

15849

AN:

1461246

Hom.:

113

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0107

AC XY:

7781

AN XY:

726922

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00266

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00537

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0313

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00526

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00649

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0116

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0128

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00814

AC:

1240

AN:

152292

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00780

AC XY:

581

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00193

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00863

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0346

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00663

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00433

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0115

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0142

Alfa

AF:

0.0116

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00851

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00433

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0124

EpiControl

AF:

0.0133

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:20Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:8

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 16, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 20, 2012

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 21, 2013

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Gln370Gln in exon 11 of TSC2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 1.5% (125/8600) of E uropean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs1800742). -

Nov 13, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:5

Mar 29, 2019

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 30, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Aug 23, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The c.1110G>A (p.Gln370=) in TSC2 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.01 predominantly in individuals of European descent (0.016; 1083/65734) including 12 homozygous spread through 4 out of 6 populations. The variant of interest has been reported as polymorphism via publications and cited as Benign by multiple reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -

Nov 13, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TSC2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:2Other:1

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: curation

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Nov 21, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.59

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over