Menu
GeneBe

rs1800744

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong

The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4535G>T(p.Ser1512Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00308 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S1512C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0032 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense

Scores

1
7
9

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:38O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.21
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.031846404).
BP6
Variant 17-43074471-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43074471-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41826.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43074471-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-43074471-C-A is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic]. Variant chr17-43074471-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA1NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4535G>T p.Ser1512Ile missense_variant 14/23 ENST00000357654.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA1ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4535G>T p.Ser1512Ile missense_variant 14/231 NM_007294.4 P4P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00225
AC:
343
AN:
152166
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000676
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00381
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00237
AC:
596
AN:
251366
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00247
AC XY:
336
AN XY:
135850
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00437
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000490
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00316
AC:
4625
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00310
AC XY:
2251
AN XY:
727226
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00555
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00273
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00226
AC:
344
AN:
152284
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00205
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000674
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00382
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00236
Alfa
AF:
0.00391
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00241
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00405
AC:
15
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00441
AC:
17
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00395
AC:
34
ExAC
AF:
0.00215
AC:
261
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00485
EpiControl
AF:
0.00332

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:38Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:13
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyPathway GenomicsJul 24, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 08, 2011- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Aug 10, 2015IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.00000000000309 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)Jun 21, 1999- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylMar 19, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaAug 07, 2018This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
not specified Benign:11Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchResearch Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of TorontoJan 31, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 10, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 07, 2016- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BRCA1, c.4535G>T, p.Ser1512Ile variant has been reported in the literature in 6/2156 proband chromosomes of individuals with HBOC and sporadic breast/ ovarian cancer. It was also identified in 6/1360 of the control chromosomes evaluated (Al-Mulla_2008, Bergthorsson_2001, Young_2009, Wagner_1998, Tavtigian_2006, Phelan_2005, Sanz_2010). The variant has also been previously identified in our laboratory in 6 individuals, and was classified as benign. The variant is reported in the BIC (x58), Exome Server and BOCs databases. It is also listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs1800744) with a MAF score of 0.001 (1000 Genomes), increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. The residue is not conserved in mammals, and computational analyses (PolyPhen, SIFT, AlignGVGD) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein. However, this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Functional studies examining the effect of the variant on transcriptional activation found that the variant levels were equal to or higher than that of wild type BRCA1, suggesting that it does not represent a high risk variant & is likely to have low clinical significance (Phelan_2005). Studies have also reported that p.Ser1512Ile has been found to co-occur with other known BRCA1 pathogenic variants numerous times, increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance (Bergthorsson_2001, Tavtigian_2006, Phelan_2005). In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as Benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoDec 09, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2020- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 24, 2014- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Sep 27, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 06, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024BRCA1: BS1, BS2 -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 25, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 11, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 20, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsApr 25, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 21, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsDec 23, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.080
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.11
Cadd
Benign
18
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.33
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.17
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.84
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.68
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.032
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.12
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.29
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D;N;.;D;.;N;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.52
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D;.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.014
D;T;D;D;D;T;D;.;.;D
Polyphen
0.34, 0.88
.;B;.;.;.;.;.;.;P;.
Vest4
0.47
MVP
0.85
MPC
0.10
ClinPred
0.033
T
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.081
gMVP
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800744; hg19: chr17-41226488; COSMIC: COSV100523556; COSMIC: COSV100523556; API