rs1800973
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000239.3(LYZ):c.263C>A(p.Thr88Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0532 in 1,613,898 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,628 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000239.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial visceral amyloidosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- ALys amyloidosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000239.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYZ | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.263C>A | p.Thr88Asn | missense | Exon 2 of 4 | ENSP00000261267.2 | P61626 | ||
| LYZ | TSL:2 | c.263C>A | p.Thr88Asn | missense | Exon 2 of 3 | ENSP00000449898.1 | A0A0B4J259 | ||
| LYZ | TSL:2 | c.263C>A | p.Thr88Asn | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000449969.1 | F8VV32 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0421 AC: 6398AN: 152070Hom.: 174 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0422 AC: 10610AN: 251424 AF XY: 0.0425 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0543 AC: 79435AN: 1461710Hom.: 2454 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0538 AC XY: 39085AN XY: 727158 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0421 AC: 6400AN: 152188Hom.: 174 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0389 AC XY: 2893AN XY: 74390 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at