Menu
GeneBe

rs1801426

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.10234A>G(p.Ile3412Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0102 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 726 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I3412S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 287 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0075 ( 439 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:2B:40O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.556
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017527342).
BP6
Variant 13-32398747-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32398747-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41540.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32398747-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr13-32398747-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.104 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.10234A>G p.Ile3412Val missense_variant 27/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.10234A>G p.Ile3412Val missense_variant 27/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0363
AC:
5525
AN:
152176
Hom.:
283
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0453
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00876
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0320
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0233
AC:
5843
AN:
250706
Hom.:
271
AF XY:
0.0180
AC XY:
2435
AN XY:
135584
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.109
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0905
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00801
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0157
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00751
AC:
10984
AN:
1461644
Hom.:
439
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00670
AC XY:
4869
AN XY:
727126
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.115
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0843
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000612
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0215
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00708
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0364
AC:
5536
AN:
152294
Hom.:
287
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0366
AC XY:
2728
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.107
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0456
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0233
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00331
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00876
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0317
Alfa
AF:
0.00762
Hom.:
78
Bravo
AF:
0.0447
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.106
AC:
469
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00186
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.0223
AC:
2714
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0250
AC:
89
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:40Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:11
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterliterature onlyCounsylJan 02, 2014- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Mar 14, 2011- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganNov 03, 2014- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical CenterSep 21, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center UtrechtOct 09, 2014- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationEvidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)Jan 12, 2015Class 1 not pathogenic based on frequency >1% in an outbred sampleset. Frequency 0.02972 (Asian), 0.126 (African), derived from 1000 genomes (2012-04-30). -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBRCAlab, Lund UniversityMar 02, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Feb 05, 2013- -
not specified Benign:10Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCancer Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer AgencyApr 18, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 19, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 28, 2016Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 15, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchResearch Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Women's College Hospital, University of TorontoJan 31, 2014- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Mar 23, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsMar 02, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 19, 2014This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingVantari GeneticsJan 06, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthNov 05, 2014- -
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJun 28, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJul 13, 2012- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicDec 19, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchGenetics Program, Instituto Nacional de CancerNov 01, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 13, 2014- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsFeb 23, 2017- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyCenter for Precision Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital-- -
Breast neoplasm Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchA.C.Camargo Cancer Center / LGBM, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center-- -
Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsMay 17, 2022- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJul 10, 2015- -
Fanconi anemia complementation group D1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The p.Ile3412Val variant has been previously reported in the literature in 59 of 4707 (frequency of 0.006) probands with breast or esophageal cancer and was also identified in 33 of 5486 (frequency of 0.003) controls increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant (Capanu_2011_21520273, Vehmanen_1997_ 9150152, Freedman_2004_15317758, Johnson_2007­_17341484, Bergthorsson_2001_11389159, Kuusisto_2011_­21356067, Palmieri_2002_12453858, Hu_2004_14647438). The variant was also identified in the LOVD (4X), UMD (30X), and BIC (111X) databases. It is listed in dbSNP database as coming from a "clinical source" (ID#: rs1801426) with a global minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.043 (1000 genomes), increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign variant. The Ile3412 residue is not highly conserved in mammals and computational analyses (SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not predict any effect on the protein function. In the UMD database, this variant has been identified in three individuals with a second pathogenic variant with a breast or ovarian cancer phenotype, and also found co-occurring with a deleterious BRCA2 mutation 1493delA in a cell line derived from a primary breast cancer (Teng 1996), thereby increasing the likelihood that this variant does not have clinical significance. In addition, Myriad genetics has reported this variant as a polymorphism increasing the likelihood this variant is benign (personal communication). In summary, based on the above information, this variant is classified as benign -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.74
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.75
Cadd
Benign
0.47
Dann
Benign
0.49
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.3
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.019
N
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.24
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.090
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.028
Sift
Benign
0.92
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.35
T;T
Vest4
0.020
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.00057
T
GERP RS
-0.29
gMVP
0.018

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1801426; hg19: chr13-32972884; COSMIC: COSV58412412; COSMIC: COSV58412412; API