rs1801591
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000126.4(ETFA):c.512C>T(p.Thr171Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0821 in 1,612,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,118 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T171T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000126.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFA | NM_000126.4 | c.512C>T | p.Thr171Ile | missense_variant | 6/12 | ENST00000557943.6 | |
ETFA | NM_001127716.2 | c.365C>T | p.Thr122Ile | missense_variant | 5/11 | ||
ETFA | XR_007064434.1 | n.593C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 6/12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETFA | ENST00000557943.6 | c.512C>T | p.Thr171Ile | missense_variant | 6/12 | 1 | NM_000126.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0643 AC: 9783AN: 152150Hom.: 433 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0736 AC: 18483AN: 251282Hom.: 810 AF XY: 0.0757 AC XY: 10285AN XY: 135808
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0840 AC: 122594AN: 1460138Hom.: 5685 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0837 AC XY: 60798AN XY: 726474
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0643 AC: 9790AN: 152270Hom.: 433 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0663 AC XY: 4933AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 01, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 24, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 08, 2013 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 10, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Feb 15, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at