rs1801696
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_000384.3(APOB):c.7696G>A(p.Glu2566Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00302 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000384.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOB | NM_000384.3 | c.7696G>A | p.Glu2566Lys | missense_variant | 26/29 | ENST00000233242.5 | NP_000375.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOB | ENST00000233242.5 | c.7696G>A | p.Glu2566Lys | missense_variant | 26/29 | 1 | NM_000384.3 | ENSP00000233242 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00287 AC: 437AN: 152190Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00256 AC: 643AN: 251118Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00250 AC XY: 339AN XY: 135698
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00304 AC: 4437AN: 1461782Hom.: 10 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00299 AC XY: 2174AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00287 AC: 437AN: 152308Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00293 AC XY: 218AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.9% (61/6612) Finnish chromosomes - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 19, 2024 | Variant summary: APOB c.7696G>A (p.Glu2566Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 251118 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0037 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 185 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in APOB causing Early Onset Coronary Artery Disease phenotype (2e-05). c.7696G>A has been reported in the literature in heterozygous individuals affected with familial hypercholesterolemia in concurrence with c.10580G>A (p.Arg3527Gln) that has been classified as pathogenic by our laboratury (Radovica-Spalvina_2015). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. The following publication have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26415676). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 189300). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Dec 10, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 06, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 23, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 08, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | APOB: BP4, BS2 - |
Hypercholesterolemia, familial, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Robarts Research Institute, Western University | Aug 22, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics, University of Luebeck | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Cardiovascular Research Group, Instituto Nacional de Saude Doutor Ricardo Jorge | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Sep 22, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
See cases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Muenster | Dec 08, 2021 | ACMG categories: PM2,PP3 - |
Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Hypercholesterolemia, autosomal dominant, type B;C4551990:Familial hypobetalipoproteinemia 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 09, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at