rs1805364
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_005591.4(MRE11):c.120C>T(p.Leu40=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00106 in 1,613,288 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00060 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
MRE11
NM_005591.4 synonymous
NM_005591.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.507
Genes affected
MRE11 (HGNC:7230): (MRE11 homolog, double strand break repair nuclease) This gene encodes a nuclear protein involved in homologous recombination, telomere length maintenance, and DNA double-strand break repair. By itself, the protein has 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and endonuclease activity. The protein forms a complex with the RAD50 homolog; this complex is required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends and possesses increased single-stranded DNA endonuclease and 3' to 5' exonuclease activities. In conjunction with a DNA ligase, this protein promotes the joining of noncomplementary ends in vitro using short homologies near the ends of the DNA fragments. This gene has a pseudogene on chromosome 3. Alternative splicing of this gene results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
Variant 11-94490866-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-94490866-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 182552.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-94490866-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.507 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000605 (92/152112) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00119 (81/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000981. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 51 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 92 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRE11 | NM_005591.4 | c.120C>T | p.Leu40= | synonymous_variant | 3/20 | ENST00000323929.8 | NP_005582.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRE11 | ENST00000323929.8 | c.120C>T | p.Leu40= | synonymous_variant | 3/20 | 1 | NM_005591.4 | ENSP00000325863 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000605 AC: 92AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000541 AC: 136AN: 251350Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000552 AC XY: 75AN XY: 135856
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
136
AN:
251350
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
75
AN XY:
135856
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00111 AC: 1626AN: 1461176Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 734AN XY: 726936
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1626
AN:
1461176
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
734
AN XY:
726936
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000605 AC: 92AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000686 AC XY: 51AN XY: 74328
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
51
AN XY:
74328
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder 1 Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Jun 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Jan 24, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Jan 04, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 27, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 21, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | MRE11: BP4, BP7 - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 06, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 21, 2018 | Variant summary: The variant MRE11A c.120C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00055 in 277082 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency is approximately 9-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MRE11A causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (6.3e-05). However, it does need to be noted that there is a pseudogene present on chromosome 3. The variant c.120C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer (Damiola_2014, Young_2016). These reports however do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 29, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Apr 13, 2021 | - - |
Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at