rs180711819

Variant names:

• chr1-237417103-A-G
• rs180711819
• NM_001035.3:c.828A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):​c.828A>G​(p.Arg276Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000178 in 1,613,478 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00083 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: RYR2 NM_001035.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1 B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.176

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
• BP6: Variant 1-237417103-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237417103-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 296705.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-237417103-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.176 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000829 (126/151990) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00275 (114/41440). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00234. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 53 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 126 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3	c.828A>G	p.Arg276Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7	c.828A>G	p.Arg276Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2	n.828A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 11 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2
RYR2	ENST00000660292.2	c.828A>G	p.Arg276Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 106			ENSP00000499787.2
RYR2	ENST00000659194.3	c.828A>G	p.Arg276Arg	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 105			ENSP00000499653.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000810 AC: 123 AN: 151872 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00269

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000721

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000273 AC: 68 AN: 249090 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000192 AC XY: 26 AN XY: 135134

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00336

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000319

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000354

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000165

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000111 AC: 162 AN: 1461488 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000977 AC XY: 71 AN XY: 727050

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00200

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000549

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000298

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000829 AC: 126 AN: 151990 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000713 AC XY: 53 AN XY: 74300

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00275

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000720

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000836 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000948

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Nov 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1

Feb 06, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: RYR2 c.828A>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change (p.Arg276Arg) and 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 48-folds higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RYR2 causing Arrhythmia phenotype (6e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in population(s) of African origin. To our knowledge, the variant, c.828A>G, has not been reported in affected individuals via publications. However, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories via ClinVar submissions (evaluated after 2014) classify the variant as "likely benign/benign" or "uncertain significance". Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1

Jan 29, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RYR2-related disorder Benign:1

Mar 05, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Sep 23, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.48
CADD	Benign	8.2
DANN	Benign	0.68

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.11		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs180711819; hg19: chr1-237580403;