rs181769913
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.2318A>G(p.Lys773Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000624 in 1,551,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RBM20
NM_001134363.3 missense
NM_001134363.3 missense
Scores
1
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.42
Genes affected
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006836772).
BP6
?
Variant 10-110812715-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110812715-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 199060.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-110812715-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110812715-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00312 (475/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0103 (427/41576). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00947. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 217 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 472 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.2318A>G | p.Lys773Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | ENST00000369519.4 | |
RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.2153A>G | p.Lys718Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | ||
RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.1934A>G | p.Lys645Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | ||
RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.1934A>G | p.Lys645Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.2318A>G | p.Lys773Arg | missense_variant | 9/14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00310 AC: 472AN: 152208Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
472
AN:
152208
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000747 AC: 117AN: 156524Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000627 AC XY: 52AN XY: 82964
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
117
AN:
156524
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
82964
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000352 AC: 493AN: 1399436Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 186AN XY: 690232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
493
AN:
1399436
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
690232
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00312 AC: 475AN: 152326Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00291 AC XY: 217AN XY: 74482
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
475
AN:
152326
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
217
AN XY:
74482
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
26
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 20, 2015 | p.Lys773Arg in exon 9 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 0.9% (20/2126) of African chromosom es by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org) an d in 8.4% (19/226) of Gambian chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (dbSNP rs1 81769913). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 26, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 19, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 16, 2019 | Variant summary: RBM20 c.2318A>G (p.Lys773Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00075 in 156524 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.01 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 400 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RBM20 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (3x benign, 1x likely benign). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | RBM20: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 15, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Feb 14, 2018 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 08, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationTaster
Benign
N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T
Sift4G
Benign
T
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at