rs181906972
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_025219.3(DNAJC5):c.107+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000983 in 1,609,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00098 ( 4 hom. )
Consequence
DNAJC5
NM_025219.3 intron
NM_025219.3 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.132
Genes affected
DNAJC5 (HGNC:16235): (DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C5) This gene is a member of the J protein family. J proteins function in many cellular processes by regulating the ATPase activity of 70 kDa heat shock proteins. The encoded protein plays a role in membrane trafficking and protein folding, and has been shown to have anti-neurodegenerative properties. The encoded protein is known to play a role in cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease. A pseudogene of this gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 8. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 20-63928462-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63928462-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 205365.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr20-63928462-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 161 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAJC5 | NM_025219.3 | c.107+10C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000360864.9 | NP_079495.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAJC5 | ENST00000360864.9 | c.107+10C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_025219.3 | ENSP00000354111 | P1 | |||
DNAJC5 | ENST00000470551.1 | c.107+10C>T | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2 | ENSP00000434744 | |||||
DNAJC5 | ENST00000703637.1 | c.107+10C>T | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | ENSP00000515413 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00106 AC: 161AN: 152178Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
161
AN:
152178
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000996 AC: 250AN: 251058Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00102 AC XY: 139AN XY: 135778
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
250
AN:
251058
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
135778
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000976 AC: 1422AN: 1457274Hom.: 4 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000920 AC XY: 667AN XY: 725372
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1422
AN:
1457274
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
667
AN XY:
725372
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00106 AC: 161AN: 152296Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00122 AC XY: 91AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
161
AN:
152296
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 15, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 29, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 09, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2022 | DNAJC5: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 4 (Kufs type) Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at