Menu
GeneBe

rs181906972

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_025219.3(DNAJC5):c.107+10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000983 in 1,609,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00098 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DNAJC5
NM_025219.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.132
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAJC5 (HGNC:16235): (DnaJ heat shock protein family (Hsp40) member C5) This gene is a member of the J protein family. J proteins function in many cellular processes by regulating the ATPase activity of 70 kDa heat shock proteins. The encoded protein plays a role in membrane trafficking and protein folding, and has been shown to have anti-neurodegenerative properties. The encoded protein is known to play a role in cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease. A pseudogene of this gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 8. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 20-63928462-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63928462-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 205365.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr20-63928462-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 161 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAJC5NM_025219.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.107+10C>T intron_variant ENST00000360864.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAJC5ENST00000360864.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.107+10C>T intron_variant 1 NM_025219.3 P1Q9H3Z4-1
DNAJC5ENST00000470551.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.107+10C>T intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2 Q9H3Z4-2
DNAJC5ENST00000703637.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.107+10C>T intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant Q9H3Z4-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00106
AC:
161
AN:
152178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000996
AC:
250
AN:
251058
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00102
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
135778
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000647
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000976
AC:
1422
AN:
1457274
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000920
AC XY:
667
AN XY:
725372
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000270
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000395
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000450
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00148
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
161
AN:
152296
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00122
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000931
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000994
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 29, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 09, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsFeb 15, 2017- -
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2022DNAJC5: BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 4 (Kufs type) Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 30, 2024- -
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
Cadd
Benign
0.34
Dann
Benign
0.68
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs181906972; hg19: chr20-62559815; API