rs181958589
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_001386094.1(AGBL1):c.3044G>A(p.Cys1015Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000685 in 1,459,786 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C1015S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001386094.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Fuchs' endothelial dystrophyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- corneal dystrophy, Fuchs endothelial, 8Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGBL1 | NM_001386094.1 | c.3044G>A | p.Cys1015Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 22 of 23 | ENST00000614907.3 | NP_001373023.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGBL1 | ENST00000614907.3 | c.3044G>A | p.Cys1015Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 22 of 23 | 5 | NM_001386094.1 | ENSP00000490608.2 | ||
AGBL1 | ENST00000441037.7 | c.3107G>A | p.Cys1036Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | 5 | ENSP00000413001.3 | |||
AGBL1 | ENST00000681381.1 | n.203G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.85e-7 AC: 1AN: 1459786Hom.: 0 Cov.: 42 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 725928 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at