rs182369459

Variant names:

• chr12-88102849-C-T
• rs182369459
• NM_025114.4:c.2980G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_Strong BP6 BS2

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.2980G>A​(p.Glu994Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00337 in 1,609,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 (2 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 (11 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10 B:5
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 4.42

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007968068).
• BP6: Variant 12-88102849-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88102849-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 195989.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=10, Benign=1, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr12-88102849-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.2980G>A	p.Glu994Lys	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.2980G>A	p.Glu994Lys	missense_variant	Exon 26 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00231 AC: 351 AN: 152100 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000917

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00491

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0000943

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00338

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00335

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00173 AC: 423 AN: 244912 Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00164 AC XY: 218 AN XY: 132998

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000655

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00293

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0000939

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00273

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00153

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00348 AC: 5076 AN: 1457102 Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00329 AC XY: 2388 AN XY: 724752

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000661

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00298

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0000767

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000352

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.000170

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00429

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00239

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00231 AC: 351 AN: 152218 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00226 AC XY: 168 AN XY: 74424

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000915

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00491

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0000943

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00338

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00331

Alfa AF: 0.00283 Hom.: 1

Bravo AF: 0.00220

TwinsUK AF: 0.00351 AC: 13

ALSPAC AF: 0.00259 AC: 10

ESP6500AA AF: 0.000272 AC: 1

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00293 AC: 24

ExAC AF: 0.00143 AC: 173

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:10 Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2 Benign:2

Aug 22, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CEP290: BS2 -

Jan 18, 2016

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 12, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 29970488, 25097241, 29398085) -

Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:2

Jan 05, 2017

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Uncertain:1

Jul 29, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1

Jan 01, 2023

Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. Regensburg

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

CEP290-related disorder Benign:1

Jan 28, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Leber congenital amaurosis Benign:1

Apr 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.14
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.26	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.14
CADD	Uncertain	26
DANN	Uncertain	1.0
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.29	.;.;T;T
Eigen	Uncertain	0.28
Eigen_PC	Uncertain	0.32
FATHMM_MKL	Uncertain	0.93	D
LIST_S2	Uncertain	0.96	D;D;D;D
M_CAP	Benign	0.042	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0080	T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-0.80	T
MutationAssessor	Uncertain	2.0	.;.;M;.
PrimateAI	Uncertain	0.52	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-1.4	N;N;N;.
REVEL	Benign	0.14
Sift	Benign	0.16	T;T;T;.
Sift4G	Uncertain	0.013	D;T;D;D
Polyphen		0.89	.;.;P;.
Vest4		0.50
MVP		0.75
MPC		0.30
ClinPred		0.043	T
GERP RS		3.9
Varity_R		0.31
gMVP		0.40

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs182369459; hg19: chr12-88496626;