rs183245562
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 1P and 5B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.45499G>A(p.Val15167Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000154 in 1,612,320 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.45499G>A | p.Val15167Ile | missense_variant | 246/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.45499G>A | p.Val15167Ile | missense_variant | 246/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000797 AC: 121AN: 151858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000194 AC: 48AN: 247566Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 18AN XY: 134304
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000870 AC: 127AN: 1460344Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000674 AC XY: 49AN XY: 726468
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000796 AC: 121AN: 151976Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000821 AC XY: 61AN XY: 74264
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 05, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Feb 25, 2013 | p.Val12599Ile in exon 195 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance due to a lack of conservation across species. Multiple mammals hav e an isoleucine (Ile; this variant) at this position, despite high nearby amino acid conservation. Computational analyses (AlignGVGD, PolyPhen2, SIFT) do not su ggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. This variant has also been ide ntified in 0.2% (8/3600) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs183245562). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 29, 2021 | Variant summary: TTN c.37795G>A (p.Val12599Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the I-band region of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0008 in 150630 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0029 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database (v3.1 genomes dataset). The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 7-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.00039), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.37795G>A in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and reported the variant as VUS (n=1), likely benign (n=2) / benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 12, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 10, 2020 | - - |
TTN-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 27, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 20, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Aug 09, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 26, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at