rs183877705
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_014008.5(CCDC22):c.926C>A(p.Ala309Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000886 in 1,196,386 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. There are 37 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014008.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC22 | NM_014008.5 | c.926C>A | p.Ala309Asp | missense_variant | 8/17 | ENST00000376227.4 | NP_054727.1 | |
CCDC22 | XM_005272599.5 | c.923C>A | p.Ala308Asp | missense_variant | 8/17 | XP_005272656.1 | ||
CCDC22 | XR_430506.4 | n.1093C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCDC22 | ENST00000376227.4 | c.926C>A | p.Ala309Asp | missense_variant | 8/17 | 1 | NM_014008.5 | ENSP00000365401.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 17AN: 112570Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000115 AC XY: 4AN XY: 34718
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000783 AC: 12AN: 153164Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 48526
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000775 AC: 84AN: 1083764Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000819 AC XY: 29AN XY: 354174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000195 AC: 22AN: 112622Hom.: 0 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.000230 AC XY: 8AN XY: 34780
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Sep 26, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at