rs184725551

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_017534.6(MYH2):​c.3432C>T​(p.Asp1144Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000736 in 1,613,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00070 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

MYH2
NM_017534.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.303

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH2 (HGNC:7572): (myosin heavy chain 2) Myosins are actin-based motor proteins that function in the generation of mechanical force in eukaryotic cells. Muscle myosins are heterohexamers composed of 2 myosin heavy chains and 2 pairs of nonidentical myosin light chains. This gene encodes a member of the class II or conventional myosin heavy chains, and functions in skeletal muscle contraction. This gene is found in a cluster of myosin heavy chain genes on chromosome 17. A mutation in this gene results in inclusion body myopathy-3. Multiple alternatively spliced variants, encoding the same protein, have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
MYHAS (HGNC:50609): (myosin heavy chain gene cluster antisense RNA) Predicted to enable primary miRNA binding activity. Predicted to be involved in response to muscle activity and skeletal muscle fiber development. Predicted to act upstream of or within with a positive effect on gene expression. Predicted to be located in cytoplasm and nucleus. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 17-10529002-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-10529002-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 196035.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.303 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00112 (171/152312) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0166 (86/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0138. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 84 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 SD,AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH2NM_017534.6 linkc.3432C>T p.Asp1144Asp synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 40 ENST00000245503.10 NP_060004.3
MYH2NM_001100112.2 linkc.3432C>T p.Asp1144Asp synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 40 NP_001093582.1
MYHASNR_125367.1 linkn.168-38535G>A intron_variant Intron 2 of 10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH2ENST00000245503.10 linkc.3432C>T p.Asp1144Asp synonymous_variant Exon 27 of 40 1 NM_017534.6 ENSP00000245503.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00112
AC:
170
AN:
152194
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00255
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00202
AC:
506
AN:
250002
AF XY:
0.00167
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00595
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000618
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000695
AC:
1016
AN:
1461414
Hom.:
8
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000630
AC XY:
458
AN XY:
727048
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000299
AC:
10
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00656
AC:
293
AN:
44668
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00895
AC:
355
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
113
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000522
AC:
3
AN:
5752
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000129
AC:
143
AN:
1111648
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00164
AC:
99
AN:
60386
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.384
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
53
107
160
214
267
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00112
AC:
171
AN:
152312
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00113
AC XY:
84
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000289
AC:
12
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00255
AC:
39
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0166
AC:
86
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00186
AC:
9
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
18
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
7
14
22
29
36
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000229
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00168

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Myopathy, proximal, and ophthalmoplegia Benign:3
Jan 15, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 13, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MYH2-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 06, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
0.30
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs184725551; hg19: chr17-10432319; API