rs185343653

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000020.3(ACVRL1):c.1246+19C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00166 in 1,612,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 41 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0089 ( 21 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00090 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

ACVRL1
NM_000020.3 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.479

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACVRL1 (HGNC:175): (activin A receptor like type 1) This gene encodes a type I cell-surface receptor for the TGF-beta superfamily of ligands. It shares with other type I receptors a high degree of similarity in serine-threonine kinase subdomains, a glycine- and serine-rich region (called the GS domain) preceding the kinase domain, and a short C-terminal tail. The encoded protein, sometimes termed ALK1, shares similar domain structures with other closely related ALK or activin receptor-like kinase proteins that form a subfamily of receptor serine/threonine kinases. Mutations in this gene are associated with hemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2, also known as Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACVRL1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet

ACVRL1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 12-51916252-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-51916252-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 254707.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00893 (1360/152272) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0312 (1298/41568). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0298. There are 21 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 640 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 21 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACVRL1	NM_000020.3 link	c.1246+19C>T		intron_variant	Intron 8 of 9	ENST00000388922.9	NP_000011.2	P37023A0A0S2Z310

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ACVRL1	ENST00000388922.9 link	c.1246+19C>T		intron_variant	Intron 8 of 9	1	NM_000020.3	ENSP00000373574.4		P37023

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00891

AC:

1355

AN:

152154

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0312

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00717

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00225

AC:

552

AN:

245358

AF XY:

0.00160

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0318

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000636

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00116

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000903

AC:

1318

AN:

1459838

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000778

AC XY:

565

AN XY:

726136

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0321

AC:

1074

AN:

33422

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00153

AC:

AN:

44500

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26098

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39642

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000349

AC:

AN:

85980

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52914

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00174

AC:

AN:

5756

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000261

AC:

AN:

1111206

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00222

AC:

134

AN:

60320

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

117

175

234

292

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00893

AC:

1360

AN:

152272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00860

AC XY:

640

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0312

AC:

1298

AN:

41568

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00274

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5160

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10608

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000735

AC:

AN:

68012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00710

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.504

Heterozygous variant carriers

129

194

258

323

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00450

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00994

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00231

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Telangiectasia, hereditary hemorrhagic, type 2

Benign:3

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 22, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 05, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

5.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.63

PhyloP100

0.48

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over