rs185527578
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000135.4(FANCA):c.3348+7G>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000421 in 1,609,346 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000135.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCA | NM_000135.4 | c.3348+7G>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000389301.8 | NP_000126.2 | |||
FANCA | NM_001286167.3 | c.3348+7G>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | NP_001273096.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FANCA | ENST00000389301.8 | c.3348+7G>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_000135.4 | ENSP00000373952 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152246Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000551 AC: 138AN: 250482Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000627 AC XY: 85AN XY: 135486
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000427 AC: 622AN: 1456982Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000439 AC XY: 318AN XY: 725080
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000368 AC: 56AN: 152364Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000362 AC XY: 27AN XY: 74502
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Fanconi anemia complementation group A Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 07, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Fanconi anemia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 05, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 14, 2019 | - - |
FANCA-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 05, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at