rs185706635

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001039958.2(MESP2):c.908T>C(p.Leu303Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00158 in 1,611,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 54 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0019 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 50 hom. )

Consequence

MESP2
NM_001039958.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.683

Variant links:

Genes affected

MESP2 (HGNC:29659): (mesoderm posterior bHLH transcription factor 2) This gene encodes a member of the bHLH family of transcription factors and plays a key role in defining the rostrocaudal patterning of somites via interactions with multiple Notch signaling pathways. This gene is expressed in the anterior presomitic mesoderm and is downregulated immediately after the formation of segmented somites. This gene also plays a role in the formation of epithelial somitic mesoderm and cardiac mesoderm. Mutations in the MESP2 gene cause autosomal recessive spondylocostal dystosis 2 (SCD02). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

MESP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0041748583).

BP6

Variant 15-89777265-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89777265-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 257249.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-89777265-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00189 (288/152368) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0289 (150/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0251. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 161 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MESP2	NM_001039958.2 link	c.908T>C	p.Leu303Pro	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 2	ENST00000341735.5	NP_001035047.1	Q0VG99

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MESP2	ENST00000341735.5 link	c.908T>C	p.Leu303Pro	missense_variant	Exon 1 of 2	1	NM_001039958.2	ENSP00000342392.3	Q0VG99
MESP2	ENST00000560219.2 link	c.31-800T>C		intron_variant	Intron 2 of 2	1		ENSP00000452998.1	H0YKZ5
MESP2	ENST00000558723.1 link	n.39-800T>C		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00189

AC:

288

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000169

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00818

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0288

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000827

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00470

AC:

1123

AN:

239054

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00400

AC XY:

526

AN XY:

131586

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0165

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0296

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000233

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00359

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00155

AC:

2258

AN:

1458702

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00141

AC XY:

1023

AN XY:

725436

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0151

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000384

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0357

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000268

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00169

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00189

AC:

288

AN:

152368

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00216

AC XY:

161

AN XY:

74516

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00816

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0289

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000828

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00146

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00265

ExAC

AF:

0.00414

AC:

498

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000594

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Spondylocostal dysostosis 2, autosomal recessive

Benign:2

Dec 09, 2019

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

MESP2-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 17, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.16

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.19

Eigen

Benign

-0.45

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.47

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.19

LIST_S2

Benign

0.41

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0042

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.42

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.40

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.8

REVEL

Benign

0.28

Sift

Uncertain

0.0010

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0030

Polyphen

0.33

Vest4

0.45

MVP

0.73

MPC

1.8

ClinPred

0.027

GERP RS

3.5

Varity_R

0.51

gMVP

0.43

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over