rs185709089
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_030787.4(CFHR5):c.254-5C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0044 in 1,601,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030787.4 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFHR5 | NM_030787.4 | c.254-5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000256785.5 | NP_110414.1 | |||
CFHR5 | XM_011510020.3 | c.263-5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | XP_011508322.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFHR5 | ENST00000256785.5 | c.254-5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_030787.4 | ENSP00000256785.4 | ||||
CFHR5 | ENST00000699466.1 | c.-2-5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENSP00000514393.1 | ||||||
CFHR5 | ENST00000699468.1 | c.-25+6276C>T | intron_variant | ENSP00000514394.1 | ||||||
CFHR5 | ENST00000699467.1 | n.323-5C>T | splice_region_variant, intron_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00368 AC: 558AN: 151780Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00317 AC: 790AN: 249462Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00307 AC XY: 414AN XY: 134896
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00447 AC: 6487AN: 1449832Hom.: 19 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00432 AC XY: 3118AN XY: 721592
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00368 AC: 559AN: 151894Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00375 AC XY: 278AN XY: 74226
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 25, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 06, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Genomic Medicine (IGM) Clinical Laboratory, Nationwide Children's Hospital | Jul 17, 2017 | BS1, BP4; This alteration has an allele frequency that is greater than expected for the associated disease, and is predicted to be tolerated by multiple functional prediction tools. - |
Kidney disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
CFH-Related Dense Deposit Disease / Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
CFHR5 deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at