rs185831378

Positions:

chrX-13760390-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting

The NM_003611.3(OFD1):c.1930C>T(p.Arg644Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000795 in 1,207,208 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 38 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000071 ( 0 hom., 2 hem., cov: 23)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000080 ( 0 hom. 36 hem. )

Consequence

OFD1
NM_003611.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.448

Variant links:

Genes affected

OFD1 (HGNC:2567): (OFD1 centriole and centriolar satellite protein) This gene is located on the X chromosome and encodes a centrosomal protein. A knockout mouse model has been used to study the effect of mutations in this gene. The mouse gene is also located on the X chromosome, however, unlike the human gene it is not subject to X inactivation. Mutations in this gene are associated with oral-facial-digital syndrome type I and Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome type 2. Many pseudogenes have been identified; a single pseudogene is found on chromosome 5 while as many as fifteen have been found on the Y chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

OFD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0057472587).

BP6

Variant X-13760390-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-13760390-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 412876.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000715 (8/111963) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00168 (6/3561). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000733. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 XL geneVariant has number of hemizygotes lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
OFD1	NM_003611.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.1930C>T	p.Arg644Cys	missense_variant	16/23	ENST00000340096.11	NP_003602.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
OFD1	ENST00000340096.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.1930C>T	p.Arg644Cys	missense_variant	16/23	1	NM_003611.3	ENSP00000344314	P1	O75665-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000715

AC:

AN:

111911

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000587

AC XY:

AN XY:

34083

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000325

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

181292

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000273

AC XY:

AN XY:

65926

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000539

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000370

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000225

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000803

AC:

AN:

1095245

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000997

AC XY:

AN XY:

361079

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000381

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000186

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000226

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000653

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000715

AC:

AN:

111963

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000586

AC XY:

AN XY:

34145

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000325

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000176

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000346

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000272

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Oct 12, 2017

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 28, 2017

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Jun 01, 2021

- -

Familial aplasia of the vermis;C1510460:Orofaciodigital syndrome I

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Oct 13, 2022

- -

Retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

research

Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University

Oct 01, 2023

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.086

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.31

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.22

CADD

Benign

9.5

DANN

Benign

0.89

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.21

T;.;.

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.055

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

T;T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.18

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0057

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.22

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

M;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.27

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.0

D;D;D

REVEL

Benign

0.17

Sift

Benign

0.20

T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.17

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.055

B;B;B

Vest4

0.18

MVP

0.75

MPC

0.18

ClinPred

0.025

GERP RS

-1.5

Varity_R

0.12

gMVP

0.14

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over