rs185863881
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_153006.3(NAGS):c.374C>A(p.Thr125Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0034 in 1,569,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153006.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGS | NM_153006.3 | c.374C>A | p.Thr125Lys | missense_variant | 1/7 | ENST00000293404.8 | NP_694551.1 | |
NAGS | XM_011524438.2 | c.374C>A | p.Thr125Lys | missense_variant | 1/6 | XP_011522740.1 | ||
NAGS | XM_011524439.2 | c.-347C>A | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/7 | XP_011522741.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGS | ENST00000293404.8 | c.374C>A | p.Thr125Lys | missense_variant | 1/7 | 1 | NM_153006.3 | ENSP00000293404 | P1 | |
NAGS | ENST00000589767.1 | c.281C>A | p.Thr94Lys | missense_variant | 1/7 | 2 | ENSP00000465408 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00196 AC: 299AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00272 AC: 480AN: 176178Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00318 AC XY: 309AN XY: 97138
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00355 AC: 5033AN: 1417460Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00372 AC XY: 2613AN XY: 702376
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00196 AC: 299AN: 152354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00162 AC XY: 121AN XY: 74504
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hyperammonemia, type III Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 18, 2019 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Elsea Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine | Apr 01, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Sep 15, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | NAGS: BP4, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 26, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
NAGS-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 01, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at