rs186881889
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_001244008.2(KIF1A):āc.2958G>Cā(p.Val986Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 1,613,678 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0016 ( 1 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes š: 0.0022 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
KIF1A
NM_001244008.2 synonymous
NM_001244008.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.47
Genes affected
KIF1A (HGNC:888): (kinesin family member 1A) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the kinesin family and functions as an anterograde motor protein that transports membranous organelles along axonal microtubules. Mutations at this locus have been associated with spastic paraplegia-30 and hereditary sensory neuropathy IIC. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 2-240750448-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-240750448-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 211281.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3}. Variant chr2-240750448-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.47 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00164 (250/152374) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00203 (138/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00175. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 131 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF1A | NM_001244008.2 | c.2958G>C | p.Val986Val | synonymous_variant | 28/49 | ENST00000498729.9 | NP_001230937.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF1A | ENST00000498729.9 | c.2958G>C | p.Val986Val | synonymous_variant | 28/49 | 5 | NM_001244008.2 | ENSP00000438388.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00164 AC: 250AN: 152256Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
250
AN:
152256
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00200 AC: 498AN: 248680Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00173 AC XY: 234AN XY: 135028
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
498
AN:
248680
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
234
AN XY:
135028
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00219 AC: 3203AN: 1461304Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00211 AC XY: 1536AN XY: 726984
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3203
AN:
1461304
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
1536
AN XY:
726984
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00164 AC: 250AN: 152374Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00176 AC XY: 131AN XY: 74508
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
250
AN:
152374
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
131
AN XY:
74508
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | KIF1A: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 31, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 23, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 09, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary spastic paraplegia 30 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 04, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Apr 08, 2021 | - - |
Neuropathy, hereditary sensory, type 2C;C5235139:Hereditary spastic paraplegia 30;C5393830:Intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 9 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 22, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at