rs1869780
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005529.7(HSPG2):c.204C>A(p.Asp68Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00155 in 1,614,084 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D68N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005529.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPG2 | NM_005529.7 | c.204C>A | p.Asp68Glu | missense_variant | 3/97 | ENST00000374695.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSPG2 | ENST00000374695.8 | c.204C>A | p.Asp68Glu | missense_variant | 3/97 | 1 | NM_005529.7 | P1 | |
HSPG2 | ENST00000412328.5 | n.141C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/6 | 2 | ||||
HSPG2 | ENST00000439717.2 | n.102C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/5 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00145 AC: 220AN: 152190Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00222 AC: 558AN: 251192Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00202 AC XY: 274AN XY: 135764
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00156 AC: 2281AN: 1461776Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00159 AC XY: 1159AN XY: 727178
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00144 AC: 219AN: 152308Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00167 AC XY: 124AN XY: 74474
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 13, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 06, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 11, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 16, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 11, 2021 | - - |
Lethal Kniest-like syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
HSPG2-related condition Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 01, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Schwartz-Jampel syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at