rs187333111

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001029883.3(PCARE):​c.3739G>A​(p.Gly1247Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00698 in 1,573,766 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 97 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0046 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0072 ( 93 hom. )

Consequence

PCARE
NM_001029883.3 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.07

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PCARE (HGNC:34383): (photoreceptor cilium actin regulator) The protein encoded by this gene is highly expressed in photoreceptors and may associate with the primary cilium of the outer segment. The encoded protein appears to undergo post-translational lipid modification. Nonsense and missense variants of this gene appear to cause a recessive form of retinitis pigmentosa. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
PCARE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • PCARE-related retinopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • retinitis pigmentosa 54
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017879605).
BP6
Variant 2-29064997-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29064997-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 195107.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00456 (695/152334) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0329 (159/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0288. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 336 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PCARENM_001029883.3 linkc.3739G>A p.Gly1247Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000331664.6 NP_001025054.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PCAREENST00000331664.6 linkc.3739G>A p.Gly1247Ser missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 2 NM_001029883.3 ENSP00000332809.4
ENSG00000308575ENST00000835145.1 linkn.108+1102C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2
ENSG00000308575ENST00000835146.1 linkn.91+1106C>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2
ENSG00000308575ENST00000835147.1 linkn.-41C>T upstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00457
AC:
695
AN:
152216
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00242
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00806
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00254
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00557
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00827
AC:
1470
AN:
177758
AF XY:
0.0102
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000499
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00598
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00184
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00668
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00625
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00724
AC:
10297
AN:
1421432
Hom.:
93
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00802
AC XY:
5642
AN XY:
703582
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000650
AC:
21
AN:
32306
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00229
AC:
89
AN:
38850
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00582
AC:
148
AN:
25444
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000108
AC:
4
AN:
37004
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0327
AC:
2660
AN:
81328
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00199
AC:
101
AN:
50778
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
64
AN:
5546
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00623
AC:
6797
AN:
1091324
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00702
AC:
413
AN:
58852
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.487
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
665
1330
1996
2661
3326
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
278
556
834
1112
1390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00456
AC:
695
AN:
152334
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00451
AC XY:
336
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00120
AC:
50
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00242
AC:
37
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00806
AC:
28
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0329
AC:
159
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00254
AC:
27
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0170
AC:
5
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00557
AC:
379
AN:
68036
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00426
AC:
9
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
35
70
104
139
174
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00554
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.00388
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00674
AC:
25
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00727
AC:
28
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00126
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00555
AC:
46
ExAC
AF:
0.00717
AC:
853
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00953
AC:
33
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
May 30, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Dec 18, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinitis pigmentosa 54 Benign:2
Aug 30, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 26, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.069
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.79
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.0060
DANN
Benign
0.53
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0017
T
Eigen
Benign
-2.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0050
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.41
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.95
T
PhyloP100
-2.1
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.84
N
REVEL
Benign
0.075
Sift
Benign
1.0
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Vest4
0.034
ClinPred
0.0019
T
GERP RS
-7.2
Varity_R
0.023
gMVP
0.019
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs187333111; hg19: chr2-29287863; COSMIC: COSV105234425; COSMIC: COSV105234425; API