rs187380128
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.1608C>T(p.Cys536Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
USH2A
NM_206933.4 synonymous
NM_206933.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.413
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 1-216321919-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216321919-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 166524.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.413 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | NM_206933.4 | c.1608C>T | p.Cys536Cys | synonymous_variant | 9/72 | ENST00000307340.8 | NP_996816.3 | |
USH2A | NM_007123.6 | c.1608C>T | p.Cys536Cys | synonymous_variant | 9/21 | NP_009054.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | ENST00000307340.8 | c.1608C>T | p.Cys536Cys | synonymous_variant | 9/72 | 1 | NM_206933.4 | ENSP00000305941.3 | ||
USH2A | ENST00000366942.3 | c.1608C>T | p.Cys536Cys | synonymous_variant | 9/21 | 1 | ENSP00000355909.3 | |||
USH2A | ENST00000674083.1 | c.1608C>T | p.Cys536Cys | synonymous_variant | 9/73 | ENSP00000501296.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152036Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
152036
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000514 AC: 129AN: 250988Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000465 AC XY: 63AN XY: 135616
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
129
AN:
250988
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
63
AN XY:
135616
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000124 AC: 181AN: 1461658Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000114 AC XY: 83AN XY: 727134
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
181
AN:
1461658
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
727134
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000242 AC XY: 18AN XY: 74364
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
74364
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 19, 2013 | Cys536Cys in Exon 9 of USH2A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, it is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1.3% (5/394) of Han Chinese chromosomes by the 1000 Genomes Project (dbSNP rs187380128). - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at