rs187660800
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_145016.4(GLYATL2):c.515A>C(p.His172Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000348 in 1,609,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H172Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145016.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_145016.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLYATL2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.515A>C | p.His172Pro | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000287275.1 | Q8WU03 | ||
| GLYATL2 | TSL:1 | c.515A>C | p.His172Pro | missense | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000434277.1 | Q8WU03 | ||
| GLYATL2 | TSL:3 | n.497A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000493 AC: 12AN: 243648 AF XY: 0.0000227 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000165 AC: 24AN: 1457690Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 11AN XY: 724936 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000148 AC XY: 11AN XY: 74476 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at