rs187695569

Positions:

chr2-61839871-A-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001201543.2(FAM161A):c.1133T>G(p.Leu378Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00352 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 22 hom. )

Consequence

FAM161A
NM_001201543.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.17

Variant links:

Genes affected

FAM161A (HGNC:25808): (FAM161 centrosomal protein A) This gene belongs to the FAM161 family. It is expressed mainly in the retina. Mouse studies suggested that this gene is involved in development of retinal progenitors during embryogenesis, and that its activity is restricted to mature photoreceptors after birth. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa-28. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

FAM161A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008030057).

BP6

Variant 2-61839871-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-61839871-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 167058.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr2-61839871-A-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00378 (575/152284) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00575 (88/15302). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00478. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 273 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FAM161A	NM_001201543.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.1133T>G	p.Leu378Arg	missense_variant	3/7	ENST00000404929.6	NP_001188472.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FAM161A	ENST00000404929.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1133T>G	p.Leu378Arg	missense_variant	3/7	1	NM_001201543.2	ENSP00000385158	P1	Q3B820-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00378

AC:

575

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000990

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0724

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00576

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00423

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00860

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00305

AC:

758

AN:

248790

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00325

AC XY:

439

AN XY:

134968

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00855

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00416

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00463

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00349

AC:

5101

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00354

AC XY:

2574

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000657

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00300

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00987

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000974

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00283

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00377

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00389

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00378

AC:

575

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00367

AC XY:

273

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000987

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00575

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00255

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00423

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00851

Alfa

AF:

0.00431

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00391

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00485

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00285

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00130

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00339

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00283

AC:

342

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00480

EpiControl

AF:

0.00474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Nov 07, 2015	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2023	FAM161A: BP4, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Retinitis pigmentosa 28

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Jun 11, 2020	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Oct 31, 2018	- -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Feb 18, 2022

Variant summary: FAM161A c.1133T>G (p.Leu378Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.003 in 248790 control chromosomes, predominantly within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database at a frequency of 0.0042, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database (v2.1 dataset) is approximately 6.7-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FAM161A causing Retinitis Pigmentosa phenotype (0.00063). The variant was also observed in the Amish subpopulation in 66/910 alleles, including 7 homozygotes, with an allele frequency of 0.0725 in the gnomAD v3.1 dataset. These data strongly suggest that the variant is a benign polymorphism. Six submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and classified the variant as VUS (n=3), likely benign (n=2) / benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

FAM161A-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 19, 2020

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.082

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.41

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.17

.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.19

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.46

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.42

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.015

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0080

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

M;M

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.9

D;D

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.13

T;T

Polyphen

0.98

D;D

Vest4

0.34

MVP

0.58

MPC

0.054

ClinPred

0.070

GERP RS

-3.1

Varity_R

0.54

gMVP

0.31

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over