rs187773880
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_182961.4(SYNE1):c.21523-8T>G variant causes a splice region, splice polypyrimidine tract, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000789 in 1,609,324 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 2/2 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_182961.4 splice_region, splice_polypyrimidine_tract, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | NM_182961.4 | c.21523-8T>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000367255.10 | NP_892006.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYNE1 | ENST00000367255.10 | c.21523-8T>G | splice_region_variant, splice_polypyrimidine_tract_variant, intron_variant | 1 | NM_182961.4 | ENSP00000356224 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00129 AC: 196AN: 151874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00170 AC: 425AN: 249566Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00156 AC XY: 210AN XY: 135016
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000735 AC: 1071AN: 1457332Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000743 AC XY: 539AN XY: 725120
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00130 AC: 198AN: 151992Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00135 AC XY: 100AN XY: 74298
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 24, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 09, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type;C2751807:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Feb 28, 2018 | - - |
Autosomal recessive ataxia, Beauce type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 4, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at