rs1881422

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.4596C>T(p.Asn1532Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0033 in 1,614,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 152 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 84 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 68 hom. )

Consequence

ALK
NM_004304.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.247

Variant links:

Genes affected

ALK (HGNC:427): (ALK receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase, which belongs to the insulin receptor superfamily. This protein comprises an extracellular domain, an hydrophobic stretch corresponding to a single pass transmembrane region, and an intracellular kinase domain. It plays an important role in the development of the brain and exerts its effects on specific neurons in the nervous system. This gene has been found to be rearranged, mutated, or amplified in a series of tumours including anaplastic large cell lymphomas, neuroblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. The chromosomal rearrangements are the most common genetic alterations in this gene, which result in creation of multiple fusion genes in tumourigenesis, including ALK (chromosome 2)/EML4 (chromosome 2), ALK/RANBP2 (chromosome 2), ALK/ATIC (chromosome 2), ALK/TFG (chromosome 3), ALK/NPM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/SQSTM1 (chromosome 5), ALK/KIF5B (chromosome 10), ALK/CLTC (chromosome 17), ALK/TPM4 (chromosome 19), and ALK/MSN (chromosome X).[provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

ALK links:

CLIP4 (HGNC:26108): (CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein family member 4) Predicted to enable microtubule plus-end binding activity. Predicted to be involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization. Located in intracellular membrane-bounded organelle. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

CLIP4 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 2-29193491-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-29193491-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 335687.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.247 with no splicing effect.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0593 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ALK	NM_004304.5 link	c.4596C>T	p.Asn1532Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 29 of 29	ENST00000389048.8	NP_004295.2	Q9UM73B6D4Y2
ALK	NM_001353765.2 link	c.1392C>T	p.Asn464Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 10 of 10		NP_001340694.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ALK	ENST00000389048.8 link	c.4596C>T	p.Asn1532Asn	synonymous_variant	Exon 29 of 29	1	NM_004304.5	ENSP00000373700.3		Q9UM73

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0174

AC:

2641

AN:

152094

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0606

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00576

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0124

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00467

AC:

1172

AN:

251148

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00351

AC XY:

477

AN XY:

135728

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0633

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00312

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000150

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00181

AC:

2646

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00162

AC XY:

1175

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0622

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00358

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000128

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000791

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00455

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0176

AC:

2677

AN:

152212

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0175

AC XY:

1305

AN XY:

74406

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0613

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00575

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0123

Alfa

AF:

0.00789

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0194

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00751

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3

Benign:4

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Aug 24, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The ALK c.4596C>T (p.Asn1532Asn) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. Mutation Taster predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. In addition, ESE finder predicts that this variant may not affect ESE sites. This variant was found in 684/121410 control chromosomes (17 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0620796 (646/10406). This frequency is about 148991 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic ALK variant (0.0000004), suggesting this is likely a common benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as Benign. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 21, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Sep 28, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

0.49

DANN

Benign

0.80

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over