rs188830619
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):c.914-27G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000069 in 1,449,894 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. There are indicators that this mutation may affect the branch point..
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001048174.2 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial adenomatous polyposis 2Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, G2P
- colorectal cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD, AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUTYH | ENST00000456914.7 | c.914-27G>T | intron_variant | Intron 11 of 15 | 1 | NM_001048174.2 | ENSP00000407590.2 | |||
ENSG00000288208 | ENST00000671898.1 | n.1502-27G>T | intron_variant | Intron 15 of 20 | ENSP00000499896.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.90e-7 AC: 1AN: 1449894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00000139 AC XY: 1AN XY: 720242 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at