rs189589556

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1031+14T>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00321 in 1,612,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0021 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0033 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.32
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 7-30612259-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30612259-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 258530.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-30612259-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00213 (325/152362) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00375 (255/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00337. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 325 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.869+14T>G intron_variant NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.1031+14T>G intron_variant 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.929+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.863+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.830+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.662+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.662+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant 3 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*745+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*369+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*901+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*973+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*482+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*320+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.*463+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.1031+14T>G intron_variant ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00213
AC:
325
AN:
152244
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000675
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000785
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00526
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00175
AC:
437
AN:
249478
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00171
AC XY:
231
AN XY:
135374
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000882
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00296
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00332
AC:
4846
AN:
1460462
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00320
AC XY:
2324
AN XY:
726638
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000230
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000861
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00394
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00321
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00213
AC:
325
AN:
152362
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00196
AC XY:
146
AN XY:
74506
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000673
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000784
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00375
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00521
Alfa
AF:
0.00273
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00215
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 12, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 22, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024GARS1: BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCentre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre LjubljanaMay 09, 2019This variant was classified as: Benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BS1,BS2. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.74
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.71
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.74
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.74
Position offset: -3

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs189589556; hg19: chr7-30651875; API