rs189690117
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001164586.2(IGFN1):c.31C>A(p.Pro11Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00678 in 1,551,648 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P11R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164586.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001164586.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGFN1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.31C>A | p.Pro11Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 24 | ENSP00000334714.4 | Q86VF2-5 | ||
| IGFN1 | TSL:1 | n.31C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 26 | ENSP00000399041.2 | Q86VF2-4 | |||
| IGFN1 | TSL:5 | c.31C>A | p.Pro11Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 25 | ENSP00000295591.9 | Q86VF2-1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00475 AC: 723AN: 152202Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00435 AC: 677AN: 155692 AF XY: 0.00438 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00700 AC: 9802AN: 1399328Hom.: 39 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00683 AC XY: 4711AN XY: 690178 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00475 AC: 723AN: 152320Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00471 AC XY: 351AN XY: 74478 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at