rs191015656

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 1P and 18B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_014915.3(ANKRD26):​c.542C>T​(p.Thr181Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00136 in 1,613,062 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T181P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00089 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ANKRD26
NM_014915.3 missense

Scores

6
7
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.54

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ANKRD26 (HGNC:29186): (ankyrin repeat domain containing 26) This gene encodes a protein containing N-terminal ankyrin repeats which function in protein-protein interactions. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant thrombocytopenia-2. Pseudogenes of this gene are found on chromosome 7, 10, 13 and 16. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
ANKRD26 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • thrombocytopenia 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • acute myeloid leukemia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal thrombocytopenia with normal platelets
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary thrombocytopenia and hematologic cancer predisposition syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, REVEL, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12240374).
BP6
Variant 10-27092502-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27092502-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 434204.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000893 (136/152268) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0015 (23/15294). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00116. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 64 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 136 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ANKRD26NM_014915.3 linkc.542C>T p.Thr181Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 34 ENST00000376087.5 NP_055730.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ANKRD26ENST00000376087.5 linkc.542C>T p.Thr181Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 34 5 NM_014915.3 ENSP00000365255.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000894
AC:
136
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000377
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00111
AC:
277
AN:
248874
AF XY:
0.00104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000754
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00232
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00140
AC:
2050
AN:
1460794
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
974
AN XY:
726782
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000359
AC:
12
AN:
33470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00224
AC:
100
AN:
44700
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26126
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39662
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86234
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000831
AC:
44
AN:
52964
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00164
AC:
1824
AN:
1111496
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
69
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.440
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
91
183
274
366
457
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
68
136
204
272
340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000893
AC:
136
AN:
152268
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000860
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
74452
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000313
AC:
13
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00150
AC:
23
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5184
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000377
AC:
4
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00138
AC:
94
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000947
AC:
2
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
17
25
34
42
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00139
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00104
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00216
AC:
8
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00147
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.00121
AC:
146
EpiCase
AF:
0.00180
EpiControl
AF:
0.00119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 24, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Reported in association with increased platelet aggregation (Chen 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27535533, 29185836)

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ANKRD26 p.T181I variant was not identified in the literature but was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs191015656) and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by University of Chicago; and as benign by Invitae and Illumina). The variant was identified in control databases in 307 of 280276 chromosomes (0 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001095, and was observed at the highest frequency in the European (non-Finnish) population in 186 of 128500 chromosomes (freq: 0.001447) (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The p.T181 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (MUT Assesor, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, MutationTaster, Revel, FATHMM, MetaLR, DANN) suggest that the variant may impact the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (Splice AI exome) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign.

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Mar 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ANKRD26: BS1, BS2

Thrombocytopenia 2 Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jun 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dec 05, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Jun 20, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ANKRD26-related disorder Benign:1
May 12, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.81
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.097
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.36
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.59
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.40
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.41
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.79
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;M
PhyloP100
7.5
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.0
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.78
Sift
Benign
0.031
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D
Vest4
0.83
ClinPred
0.065
T
GERP RS
4.3
Varity_R
0.34
gMVP
0.66
Mutation Taster
=77/23
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs191015656; hg19: chr10-27381431; API